Judge Expands Injunction on Abortion Pill Reversal Speech
A federal judge in New York bars the state attorney general from censoring pro-life groups promoting abortion pill reversal.
Updated on Nov. 10, 2026 in Criminal Justice
Live Poll
Should state governments be allowed to restrict pregnancy centers from promoting abortion pill reversal?
U.S. District Judge John Sinatra of the Western District of New York expanded a preliminary injunction to bar New York Attorney General Letitia James from censoring unnamed New York members of the National Institute of Family and Life Advocates who promote abortion pill reversal. The order extends an earlier injunction issued in September 2024.
Why it matters
The ruling addresses whether state officials can pursue legal action against groups that promote abortion pill reversal, a treatment in which progesterone is taken to counteract mifepristone. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has argued that scientific evidence for the treatment's effectiveness is lacking, while James has argued such claims could be unsafe.
The expanded preliminary injunction in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates et al. v. Letitia James remains in place as the case proceeds. The status of the May 2024 suit against Heartbeat International and 11 pro-life pregnancy care centers is not addressed in the order.
The players
John Sinatra
A U.S. District Judge in the Western District of New York who issued the expanded injunction in this case.
Letitia James
New York's Attorney General, who sued pro-life groups over abortion pill reversal promotion and is the defendant in this case.
The details
Judge Sinatra issued the order last Friday, expanding a September 2024 preliminary injunction against James. The Thomas More Society had sued James in August 2024 on behalf of Summit Life Outreach Center and The Evergreen Association, and Alliance Defending Freedom counsel Gabriella McIntyre welcomed the expanded ruling.
Timeline
May 2024: James sued Heartbeat International and 11 pro-life pregnancy care centers over abortion pill reversal promotion.
August 2024: The Thomas More Society sued James on behalf of Summit Life Outreach Center and The Evergreen Association.
September 2024: Sinatra issued a preliminary injunction against James.
Last Friday: Sinatra issued the expanded injunction order.
Legal Context
Colorado agreed to pay $6 million in legal fees this year to settle a challenge to its 2023 law barring abortion pill reversal promotion, and a federal judge permanently enjoined enforcement of that law. The New York injunction follows a similar pattern of federal courts blocking state restrictions on pro-life speech about the treatment.
The ruling affects how pro-life pregnancy care centers in New York can promote abortion pill reversal without facing state enforcement actions. Patients considering the treatment may encounter different information from providers depending on the outcome of the underlying litigation.
The takeaway
The case shows how state consumer-protection or speech enforcement against medical claims can collide with First Amendment protections for pro-life advocacy. Readers following abortion policy should watch how courts divide on the scientific and speech questions.
Further reading
For related legal developments, explore Criminal Justice coverage.
Source note: This article includes information reported by The Christian Post.
Live Poll
Should state governments be allowed to restrict pregnancy centers from promoting abortion pill reversal?
