Judge Denied Motion to Dismiss Blind Juror Lawsuit

A federal judge ruled that a discrimination lawsuit against the New York court system may proceed to trial.

Updated on Oct. 5, 2026 in Special Education

Judge Denied Motion to Dismiss Blind Juror Lawsuit

Live Poll

Should courts be required to provide accommodations to ensure blind citizens can serve on juries?

On September 14, 2026, Judge Ramón E. Reyes Jr. denied a motion to dismiss a discrimination lawsuit brought by Albert Elia and the National Federation of the Blind - New York. The court found that the lack of accommodation procedures for blind jurors plausibly violates the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Why it matters

This ruling highlights the legal tension between current court practices and federal requirements for inclusive jury service. The case challenges the systemic absence of policies designed to support blind citizens during legal proceedings.

Plaintiffs filed the suit in March 2025, alleging the New York State Unified Court System failed to provide reasonable accommodations. The case specifically cites the refusal to allow assistive technology or verbal descriptions for blind jurors.

The players

Ramón E. Reyes Jr.

He is the federal judge in the Eastern District of New York who ruled that the lawsuit against the court system may move forward.

Albert Elia

He is a plaintiff who alleges that he was prevented from deliberating on cases because the court system failed to provide necessary accommodations.

National Federation of the Blind - New York

This is an advocacy organization that co-filed the lawsuit to challenge discriminatory practices in the state court system.

New York State Unified Court System

This is the defendant agency responsible for the administration of the court system in New York State.

Kings County Commissioner of Jurors

This official is a defendant in the lawsuit, representing the office responsible for summoning and qualifying jurors in Brooklyn.

The details

The lawsuit alleges that Brooklyn courts routinely exclude blind individuals from deliberations, particularly in cases involving visual evidence. Plaintiffs claim the court system lacks the necessary procedures to facilitate equal access, effectively barring blind citizens from jury service.

In March 2025, Albert Elia and the National Federation of the Blind - New York filed the lawsuit.
On September 14, 2026, Judge Ramón E. Reyes Jr. denied the motion to dismiss the lawsuit.

Culture Shift

This case reflects an evolving societal shift toward mandating full civic accessibility for individuals with disabilities. It challenges the historical legacy of the court system, which previously assumed that visual evidence required biological sight to interpret.

If the plaintiffs prevail, the New York State court system may be required to adopt new standard procedures for providing assistive technology to blind jurors. Residents who are blind may eventually see increased opportunities to participate in jury duty within the state.

The takeaway

The court's decision emphasizes that legal institutions must actively remove barriers to ensure equal access for all potential jurors. Implementing assistive technology could serve as a model for making the judicial process more inclusive across the state.