Legal Experts Debate Immigration Policy at Conference
Advocates and scholars argued over birthright citizenship and enforcement at the Federalist Society's National Lawyers Convention in Washington.
Updated on Nov. 12, 2026 in Immigration
Live Poll
Do you think immigration policy in the U.S. is heading in the right direction?
Legal advocates debated immigration policy at the Federalist Society's National Lawyers Convention in Washington, D.C. The discussion followed the U.S. Supreme Court's June decision upholding birthright citizenship in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts.
Why it matters
The panel highlighted sharp disagreement among legal scholars and advocates over how federal immigration law should be interpreted and enforced. The June Supreme Court ruling leaves the constitutional question of birthright citizenship settled for now, while debate over enforcement continues.
Panelist Amanda Frost cited that 70% of Wisconsin dairy workers are undocumented. The source does not detail the methodology behind this figure or whether it has been independently verified.
The players
Federalist Society
A conservative and libertarian legal organization that hosts national lawyers conventions and debates on legal policy.
Amanda Frost
A University of Virginia law professor who has written on citizenship and immigration law.
John Yoo
A University of Texas at Austin law professor and former Justice Department official known for his writings on executive power.
Gene Hamilton
President of the America First Legal Foundation, a conservative legal advocacy group focused on immigration enforcement.
Elle Bernstein
General counsel for U.S. Sen. Jim Banks, R-Ind., who works on Senate legal matters.
The details
Panelists included Elle Bernstein, general counsel for U.S. Sen. Jim Banks, R-Ind.; Amanda Frost, a University of Virginia law professor; Gene Hamilton, president of the America First Legal Foundation; and John Yoo, a University of Texas at Austin law professor. The discussion also referenced immigration law violations cited in Florida and Texas.
Timeline
June: The U.S. Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship.
November 12, 2026: Federalist Society convention panel debated immigration policy.
Political Context
The debate follows the Supreme Court's June decision upholding birthright citizenship, which Chief Justice John Roberts grounded in the 14th Amendment's jurisdiction clause. Panelists continued arguing over how that ruling should shape federal immigration enforcement.
The outcome of these debates shapes how federal agencies enforce immigration law and how citizenship rules apply to children born in the United States. Residents with questions about their own status should consult an immigration attorney rather than rely on panel commentary.
The takeaway
Legal experts remain divided on how far the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship ruling extends into enforcement policy. Following primary court opinions gives the clearest picture of what the law actually requires.
Further reading
For broader background, explore Immigration coverage on Wisevoter.
Source note: This article includes information reported by The Center Square.
Live Poll
Do you think immigration policy in the U.S. is heading in the right direction?
