Brivas Filed Patent Lawsuit Against Match Group

The legal action targets the dating company's use of biometric identity verification technology.

Updated on Oct. 13, 2026 in Romance

Brivas Filed Patent Lawsuit Against Match Group

Live Poll

Should companies be allowed to sue over broad biometric liveness detection patents?

Brivas has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Match Group in the Northern District of Texas. The claim alleges the company used proprietary biometric liveness detection technology without a license.

Why it matters

The case centers on claims that eight U.S. patents regarding active liveness detection methods were utilized without authorization. Brivas seeks damages, attorney's fees, and injunctive relief in the matter.

The lawsuit involves eight specific U.S. patents, including patent numbers 9,600,649, 9,602,495, 9,740,848, 10,049,203, 10,565,362, 10,587,601, 11,245,693, and 12,074,869. The technology measures physical movement and compares it to device sensors.

The players

Brivas

Brivas is a non-practicing entity headquartered in Nevada that holds patents related to biometric liveness detection.

Match Group

Match Group is a major technology company that operates various popular dating applications including Tinder and Hinge.

The details

Match Group uses FaceTec technology in its identity verification system across platforms such as Tinder, OKCupid, BLK, and Upward. Brivas, which acquired New Zealand-based 3Fish in 2025, alleges this system relies on its patented methods for confirming a live human presence.

Brivas II was created in December 2023.
Brivas acquired 3Fish in 2025.
Match Group extended its use of FaceTec biometrics to Hinge in early 2026.
Brivas filed the lawsuit on October 13, 2026.

Culture Shift

The dispute underscores the ongoing tension between digital security innovation and patent ownership in the social networking industry. This move reflects a broader trend of non-practicing entities asserting control over the biometric tools that have become standard for modern identity verification.

Users of dating apps like Tinder or Hinge will not see immediate changes to their app experience as the legal process unfolds. The outcome could eventually influence how these platforms integrate identity verification systems or manage licensing costs for biometric security.

The takeaway

This case highlights the complexities surrounding intellectual property in the competitive landscape of digital dating security. Users should remain aware that identity verification features are subject to evolving legal and corporate licensing agreements.