Tests Disproved Green Lightning Fertilizer Claims
Washington State University research found the company's nitrogen output claims were 680 times higher than reality.
Updated on Sept. 27, 2026 in Organic Food

Live Poll
Are you skeptical of marketing claims for new agricultural technologies that replace traditional fertilizer?
Independent testing at Washington State University revealed that Green Lightning's equipment produces significantly less nitrogen than marketed. In 2024, field trials confirmed that crops using the product yielded fewer bushels per acre than conventional fertilizer.
Why it matters
Discrepancies between advertised performance and actual output can lead to significant economic losses for farmers relying on equipment efficiency. These findings highlight the necessity of verified technical assessments for agricultural technology.
A Green Lightning machine produces 161 pounds of nitrogen annually compared to a company claim of 109,500 pounds. Field trials showed corn yields of 235.9 bushels per acre with the equipment versus 280.7 bushels using conventional fertilizer.
The players
Washington State University Extension
This organization conducts independent agricultural research and provides extension services to farmers across Washington state.
Precision Planting
This company specializes in agricultural technology and conducted the field trials assessing corn yield performance.
Green Lightning
This company manufactures agricultural equipment that claims to replace conventional nitrogen using plasma chemistry.
The details
The equipment utilizes electrical plasma chemistry to oxidize nitrogen from the air into nitrate in water, but testing indicated the actual output is limited to 161 pounds annually at a rate of 100 gallons per day. During 2024 trials, 120 gallons of the product were applied per acre to test plots.
Timeline
Washington State University testing and Precision Planting field trials occurred throughout 2024.
Culture Shift
The agricultural sector is currently undergoing a broader push toward sustainable, independent nitrogen production through new electrical technologies. This trend forces a reevaluation of performance claims as farmers seek alternatives to traditional, industrial fertilizers.
Farmers in Washington state should carefully evaluate the performance specifications of new nitrogen-fixing equipment before integrating it into existing operations. Relying on unverified claims may result in lower crop yields and reduced profitability compared to established conventional methods.
The takeaway
Farmers should prioritize equipment backed by verified, independent field performance data to protect their seasonal yields. Relying solely on marketing specifications without rigorous testing risks significant financial disruption to agricultural output.
Further reading
Learn more about advancements in sustainable farming practices on our Organic Food page.
Source note: This article includes information reported by RocketNews.
Live Poll
Are you skeptical of marketing claims for new agricultural technologies that replace traditional fertilizer?










