L-No Campaign Reports Spending on Amendment L

The political committee raised over $2 million to fund advertising efforts against the measure.

Updated on Oct. 21, 2026 in Philanthropy

Isometric editorial illustration of a wooden box sitting in a vast prairie, representing state ballot measure campaign funding. — The L-No committee has reported spending $1.5 million on advertising to oppose South Dakota's Amendment L, fueled by $2 million in funding. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should out-of-state money be limited in local ballot measure campaigns?

The L-No committee has spent $1.5 million on advertising to oppose Amendment L in South Dakota. The campaign reported raising more than $2 million in total funding for its operations.

Why it matters

The spending highlights the role of out-of-state capital in local ballot initiatives as the state approaches the upcoming election. Most of the campaign funds originated from organizations based in Washington, D.C.

The L-No committee reported over $2 million in total fundraising, with $1.5 million allocated specifically to advertising. Only $10,000 of the committee's total funds were raised from sources outside of Washington, D.C.

The players

L-No Committee

This political action group is the primary organization campaigning against the passage of Amendment L in South Dakota.

The details

Campaign advertisements funded by the committee argue that supporters of Amendment L are backed by out-of-state billionaires. The disclosure of these expenditures follows public campaign finance reports filed as the state prepares to vote on the measure.

Election day is scheduled for November 3, 2026.

Market Landscape

The reliance on out-of-state funding for local ballot measures reflects a broader trend of nationalized political spending in state-level elections. This approach shifts the competitive balance by concentrating significant financial resources to influence local voter perception.

Voters can expect to see an increased volume of advertisements funded by national groups leading up to the election. These financial activities may influence the final debate regarding Amendment L by emphasizing the origin of campaign support.

The takeaway

Understanding the source of political funding helps voters assess the motivations behind campaign advertising. Residents should review official disclosures to distinguish between local advocacy and national interests before heading to the polls.