Appeals Court Rules Against Ex-Forbes Hospital Technician
A federal appeals court upheld the firing of a Pittsburgh hospital worker for sleeping while on duty.
Updated on Oct. 27, 2026 in Human Resources
Live Poll
Should disability protections allow employees to avoid discipline for violating established workplace conduct rules?
On July 20, 2026, the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against a former Forbes Hospital CT scan technician who alleged wrongful termination and ADA discrimination. The court determined that employers may enforce neutral conduct policies regardless of a worker's disability status.
Why it matters
The decision clarifies the legal threshold for employers managing misconduct, reaffirming that standard workplace rules apply even when employees cite medical conditions. It serves as a reminder that the duty to request reasonable accommodations for a disability often precedes disciplinary investigations.
The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals case 25-1459 confirms the termination of a Pittsburgh hospital worker for violating neutral company policy. The investigation followed internal hospital reports regarding misconduct including failure to stock rooms and sleeping on duty.
The players
Cheryl Hileman
She was a former CT scan technician at Forbes Hospital who challenged her termination in federal court.
Forbes Hospital
This Pittsburgh-based medical institution is the employer that terminated the employee for violating policies against sleeping on the job.
3rd Circuit Court of Appeals
This federal appellate court is responsible for reviewing and deciding legal disputes within the circuit, including labor and employment cases.
The details
Cheryl Hileman was terminated from her position at Forbes Hospital after a coworker reported her for sleeping, texting, and neglecting room stocking duties. Although Hileman attributed her behavior to dry eye pain and diabetes medication, she had not requested formal disability accommodations before the misconduct investigation began.
Timeline
The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals issued the ruling on July 20, 2026.
Market Landscape
This case highlights the boundaries of the Americans with Disabilities Act when applied to workplace misconduct. It illustrates how courts balance institutional policy enforcement against federal protections for employees with medical needs.
Employees should formally document and request any necessary medical accommodations before conduct issues arise to ensure legal protection. For employers, the ruling confirms that internal investigations and enforcement of neutral conduct policies remain defensible in court.
The takeaway
This ruling establishes that medical conditions do not automatically shield employees from standard disciplinary actions for workplace misconduct. Workers are encouraged to seek clear communication with their HR departments regarding needed accommodations well before disciplinary procedures begin.
Further reading
For more information on legal standards regarding personnel management, visit the Human Resources section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by HR Daily Advisor.
Live Poll
Should disability protections allow employees to avoid discipline for violating established workplace conduct rules?
