Colgate University Hosts Lecture on Democratic Threats

Brookings Institution fellow William A. Galston discussed the impact of populism on modern democratic institutions.

Updated on Oct. 28, 2026 in Civic Engagement

Colgate University Hosts Lecture on Democratic Threats

Live Poll

Is the current state of liberal democracy in the U.S. heading in the right direction?

Colgate University held the Louis Rakin Foundation, Inc. Grant Lecture featuring William A. Galston. The discussion centered on the ongoing challenges facing liberal democracies today.

Why it matters

Understanding the rise of populism provides context for why many feel liberal democracies have failed to address critical economic and social needs. These movements often challenge the foundations of constitutionalism and the role of established institutions.

William A. Galston has authored 11 books and participated in 6 presidential campaigns throughout his career. The world is currently experiencing its 20th consecutive year of democratic decline.

The players

William A. Galston

He is a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who has served in high-level government policy roles.

Bill Clinton

He is a former President of the United States who served two terms in office during the 1990s.

Colgate University

This is a private liberal arts institution located in Hamilton that hosted the recent academic lecture.

The details

Galston describes populism as a movement that pits the will of the people against constitutional protections like the courts and a free press. He notes that populists often seek to consolidate power within the executive branch while widening the divide between the general public and elites.

From 1993 to 1995, Galston served as a deputy assistant to President Bill Clinton.
Galston founded the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement in 2001.
Galston joined the National Endowment for Democracy in the fall of 2005.
Colgate University held the Louis Rakin Foundation lecture on October 21, 2026.

Political Context

Opponents of populist rhetoric often argue that these movements weaken essential democratic checks and balances by undermining the judiciary and independent bureaucracy. Critics maintain that these institutions are vital for protecting civil liberties regardless of electoral outcomes.

Economic shifts that favor metropolitan areas while bypassing rural communities can fuel the populist sentiments discussed by experts. Residents may notice these trends manifesting in local debates over economic policy and regional development initiatives.

The takeaway

Populism remains a significant factor in contemporary politics because it highlights genuine dissatisfaction with the performance of liberal institutions. Evaluating the strength of constitutional protections is essential for maintaining democratic health in divided societies.