Buc-ee's Settled Trademark Lawsuit With Mickey's
The convenience store chains resolved a legal dispute in Ohio federal court on September 15.
Updated on Oct. 6, 2026 in Openings & Closings

Live Poll
Do you support aggressive trademark enforcement by large companies against smaller local businesses?
Buc-ee's and Coles IP Holdings reached a settlement on September 15 regarding a trademark infringement lawsuit filed in February. The legal conflict centered on claims that the logo used at 42 Mickey's locations in Ohio too closely resembled the Buc-ee's beaver mascot.
Why it matters
Buc-ee's pursued litigation to protect its trademarked branding, while Coles IP Holdings countered with allegations of malicious litigation aimed at hindering its competitive ability in the Ohio market.
Coles IP Holdings operates a network of 42 Mickey's locations across Ohio. The legal dispute arose after Buc-ee's entered the state with its first location in April.
The players
Buc-ee's
A Texas-based travel center chain known for its massive stores and beaver mascot.
Coles IP Holdings
The operator of 42 Mickey's convenience store locations throughout Ohio.
The details
Buc-ee's alleged that the rebranding of local stations from Mickey Mart to Mickey's and the use of a moose logo created customer confusion. Coles IP Holdings responded with a countersuit in April, claiming that the legal pressure from the larger chain was intended to disrupt its regional business.
Timeline
The lawsuit was originally filed in Ohio federal court in February 2026.
Buc-ee's opened its first Ohio location in April 2026.
Coles IP Holdings filed a countersuit in April 2026.
The companies reached a settlement agreement on September 15, 2026.
Market Landscape
This settlement highlights the aggressive legal strategy Buc-ee's employs to protect its brand identity as it expands into new states like Ohio. This resolution follows a pattern of intense litigation, which remains ongoing in the separate case against Beaver's Mini Mart.
Customers of the 42 Mickey's locations across the state should not expect immediate changes to the branding or operations at their local stores following this agreement. The resolution effectively removes the prospect of a prolonged court battle that could have impacted the availability of these local convenience sites.
The takeaway
Trademark protection is a significant factor in how major brands manage expansion into new territory. Business owners entering competitive markets should be prepared for potential legal scrutiny regarding their branding and intellectual property usage.
Further reading
For more on the retail environment in the state, visit Ohio Openings & Closings.
Live Poll
Do you support aggressive trademark enforcement by large companies against smaller local businesses?










