Syracuse Man Barred From Owning Firearms
A judge issued an extreme risk protection order against a Syracuse man who reportedly threatened the president.
Updated on Oct. 8, 2026 in Terrorism
Live Poll
Do you support the use of extreme risk protection orders for individuals who make workplace threats?
A state Supreme Court justice approved an extreme risk protection order on Thursday preventing a 27-year-old Syracuse man from possessing firearms. The move follows an investigation into threats made against the president.
Why it matters
Law enforcement agencies intervened after a report was filed regarding a verbal threat and hand gesture made by the subject. While no criminal charges are expected, the court order aims to mitigate potential security risks.
Justice Danielle Fogel approved the temporary order, which bars 27-year-old Christopher Vignogna from purchasing or possessing firearms. A follow-up court hearing is set for next Wednesday.
The players
Christopher Vignogna
The 27-year-old Syracuse resident is the subject of an extreme risk protection order following a workplace report.
Danielle Fogel
The state Supreme Court justice presided over the case and authorized the temporary protection order against the subject.
President Donald Trump
The current President of the United States was the target of the reported threats and has a rally scheduled in the region.
Onondaga County Sheriff's Office
This local law enforcement agency conducted the investigation alongside federal partners.
The details
The investigation involved the Secret Service, the FBI, and the Onondaga County Sheriff's Office after a co-worker reported the threats to human resources and the Rome Police Department. Vignogna, who is not expected to face criminal charges, allowed authorities to search his residence.
Timeline
Wednesday evening: Police interviewed Christopher Vignogna at his home.
Thursday: Justice Danielle Fogel approved a temporary protection order.
Friday: President Donald Trump is scheduled for a rally.
Next Wednesday: A court hearing is scheduled.
Legal Context
This case follows the standard application of New York's Extreme Risk Protection Order law, which allows courts to restrict firearm access when individuals pose a danger to themselves or others. Similar court-ordered firearm restrictions are frequently used in the state as a preemptive measure to prevent potential acts of violence.
The investigation involved high-level coordination between local and federal authorities to ensure public safety ahead of upcoming political events in the area. Residents may notice increased security presence as a result of the ongoing protective measures.
The takeaway
This incident highlights the coordination between workplace reporting systems and law enforcement to address potential threats before they escalate. It serves as a reminder of the mechanisms available to authorities to restrict firearm access when credible safety concerns arise.
What happens next
A formal court hearing is scheduled for next Wednesday to determine the long-term status of the protection order.
Further reading
For more information on regional safety, visit Terrorism.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Syracuse.
Live Poll
Do you support the use of extreme risk protection orders for individuals who make workplace threats?
