NYC Council Bans Surveillance Pricing

The 44-5 vote targets companies that use browsing data to charge different customers different prices for the same product.

Updated on Nov. 13, 2026 in Inflation

Live Poll

Do you think companies should be banned from charging you different prices based on your data?

The New York City Council passed a bill 44-5 banning surveillance pricing, the practice of using browsing data to charge customers different prices for the same product. Sponsored by Speaker Julie Menin with the support of Mayor Zohran Mamdani, the law allows transparent loyalty programs and certain discounts.

Why it matters

Speaker Julie Menin said companies set different prices for the same product by exploiting consumers' demographics, browsing history, shopping habits, and social media activity. Companies that fail to comply with the law must pay a fine of $1,000, putting direct financial consequences on businesses operating in the city.

The City Council approved the measure by a 44-5 vote, and noncompliant companies face a $1,000 fine. The extraction does not specify how enforcement will be carried out or how widespread the practice is in the city.

The players

New York City Council

The 51-member legislative body of New York City that passes local laws governing the city's five boroughs.

Julie Menin

The Speaker of the New York City Council who sponsored the surveillance pricing legislation.

Zohran Mamdani

The Mayor of New York City who supported the surveillance pricing ban and announced it publicly.

The details

The law prohibits companies from using browsing data to charge customers different prices for the same product. Uber, Lyft, Target, Instacart and airlines have faced scrutiny for alleged surveillance pricing, though many of the companies have denied using the practice.

November 12, 2026: City Council passed the surveillance pricing ban 44-5.
November 13, 2026: Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced the ban in a post on X.

Market Dynamics

The ban establishes a local legal limit on using browsing data to set individualized prices, putting New York City in position to set a regulatory standard for how retailers and ride-hailing platforms may price consumers. It arrives as Uber, Lyft, Target, Instacart and airlines face scrutiny over alleged surveillance pricing practices.

Shoppers and riders in New York City may see prices that no longer vary based on their browsing history for the same product, though the law permits transparent loyalty programs and certain discounts. Companies found out of compliance face a $1,000 fine, which could shape how personalized offers appear on apps and websites.

The takeaway

Consumers can check whether an app or website shows different prices to different users and compare offers across devices. Transparent loyalty programs remain allowed, so reviewing their terms can reveal legitimate discounts.