JPMorgan Seeks Dismissal of Sex Harassment Lawsuit
The bank argues the plaintiff coached his sister to provide false testimony in his ongoing legal battle.
Updated on Oct. 27, 2026 in Sex Crimes

Live Poll
Do you trust the integrity of testimony provided in high-profile sexual harassment lawsuits?
JPMorgan is asking a court to dismiss a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by former employee Chirayu Rana. The motion follows a recantation by Rana's sister, who claims he forced her to provide false testimony.
Why it matters
The case faces collapse as JPMorgan seeks the most serious possible sanctions against the plaintiff. The bank alleges Rana coached his sister on what to say during legal consultations, undermining the foundation of his claims.
JPMorgan has formally requested that the court impose the most serious sanctions available against Chirayu Rana. Three distinct law firms have moved to withdraw from representing him since the litigation began.
The players
JPMorgan
This is a global financial services firm and investment banking institution headquartered in Manhattan.
Chirayu Rana
He is a former employee of JPMorgan who previously worked in the company's leveraged finance division.
Lorna Hajdini
She is a JPMorgan executive who has been named as a defendant in the sexual harassment litigation.
Chandani Rana
She is the sister of Chirayu Rana who submitted an affidavit recanting her previous testimony.
The details
In an affidavit, Chandani Rana stated that her brother provided her with instructions and written notes to use when speaking with his legal team. The bank is now pushing for dismissal based on this alleged witness coaching, while executive Lorna Hajdini continues to pursue a defamation countersuit against the former employee.
Timeline
Chirayu Rana joined the leveraged finance team at JPMorgan in 2024.
Rana filed a sexual harassment lawsuit against the bank and Lorna Hajdini in April 2026.
Attorney Daniel Kaiser sought to withdraw from the case in May 2026.
Jon Norinsberg filed a motion to withdraw as counsel on October 14, 2026.
Sheharyar Ali Law Group filed a motion to withdraw on October 23, 2026.
Legal Context
This case follows a pattern set by the procedural standards for witness tampering sanctions in federal litigation, which mandate severe penalties for evidence manipulation. It reflects a broader trend of banks leveraging internal discovery to dismantle meritless harassment claims in New York courts.
Residents and local observers should note that court activity in Manhattan remains ongoing as the judge reviews the bank's motion. The high turnover of legal counsel may delay future proceedings for the parties involved.
The takeaway
Maintaining the integrity of witness testimony is a cornerstone of the American legal system. When individuals attempt to manipulate evidence through coaching, they risk facing severe professional and judicial consequences.
Further reading
For more information on legal developments in the city, visit the Sex Crimes section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Fortune.
Live Poll
Do you trust the integrity of testimony provided in high-profile sexual harassment lawsuits?










