Council Member Ossé Secures Support for CURB Act
The legislation aims to restrict NYPD use of kettling and tear gas at protests.
Updated on Oct. 16, 2026 in Legislative Policy

Live Poll
Should police units trained for counterterrorism be prohibited from responding to protests and crowd control events?
New York City Council Member Chi Ossé has secured a 26th sponsor for the CURB Act. The bill seeks to regulate NYPD tactics during First Amendment activities.
Why it matters
Proponents of the CURB Act aim to limit the power of the Strategic Response Group, which has faced scrutiny over its use of aggressive crowd control measures during protests.
The bill currently has 26 sponsors among 60 total pieces of legislation awaiting action in committee. The Strategic Response Group, the focus of the proposed restrictions, was originally established in 2015.
The players
Chi Ossé
He is a New York City Council Member representing District 36 who serves as the primary sponsor for the CURB Act.
Oswald Feliz
He is a New York City Council Member who chairs the Committee on Public Safety and holds authority over the hearing schedule for the bill.
Zohran Mamdani
He is the Mayor of New York City who maintains final authority over the deployment of the NYPD Strategic Response Group.
Jessica Tisch
She serves as the New York City Police Commissioner and maintains the confidence of the mayor's office.
The details
The CURB Act would prohibit the NYPD from using kettling and tear gas during protected demonstrations while requiring quarterly reports on officer deployments. While the NYPD maintains the unit was on standby for a recent protest in Marble Hill, Council Member Chi Ossé is pushing for stricter oversight of the force.
Timeline
The NYPD established the Strategic Response Group in 2015.
An alleged attempted bombing occurred outside Gracie Mansion in March 2026.
Council Member Chi Ossé secured a 26th sponsor for the legislation in October 2026.
Political Context
The CURB Act represents a significant legislative attempt to constrain the mission mandate of the NYPD Strategic Response Group established in 2015. Opponents of the bill argue that these restrictions could hinder the police department's ability to maintain public order during volatile situations.
Residents and protesters may see shifts in how police handle First Amendment activities if the Council successfully passes this oversight legislation. The bill's outcome will dictate whether the NYPD is required to disclose more transparency regarding their deployment strategies during public demonstrations.
The takeaway
The proposed legislation highlights a growing divide between city council oversight efforts and NYPD operational independence. Residents should monitor committee hearing announcements to see if the bill gains the momentum needed to reach a full Council vote.
Further reading
Learn more about local government actions in the New York City Legislative Policy section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by City & State NY.
Live Poll
Should police units trained for counterterrorism be prohibited from responding to protests and crowd control events?










