Blakeman Campaign Payments Face Scrutiny
The gubernatorial campaign disclosed millions in payments to advertising firms with controversial histories.
Updated on Oct. 30, 2026 in Advertising

Live Poll
Do you believe political campaigns should be held responsible for the business history of their consultants?
Between April and October 2026, the Bruce Blakeman campaign paid $4.2 million to Harris Media for digital advertising. The campaign also distributed $11,600 to Better Mousetrap Digital, a firm founded by a convicted fraudster.
Why it matters
Voters and ethics observers are scrutinizing campaign expenditures linked to firms previously involved in controversial political activities or federal financial crimes. These transactions raise questions regarding campaign vendor vetting processes in the lead-up to the New York election.
The campaign issued 800 separate installments to Better Mousetrap Digital totaling $11,600. Harris Media previously managed the 2017 federal campaign for the German party AfD, which included pitches for slogans such as 'Germany for Germans.'
The players
Bruce Blakeman
He is a political figure and candidate in the 2026 New York gubernatorial race.
Harris Media
This is a political advertising and digital media consulting firm.
Jack Daly
He is a former political operative convicted of mail fraud and lying to federal election officials.
Better Mousetrap Digital
This is a digital services firm founded by a previously convicted fraudster.
The details
Better Mousetrap Digital was founded in 2023 by Jack Daly, who served four months in prison following a federal fraud conviction involving a scam PAC that raised $1.6 million. Harris Media has faced criticism for its prior international political work, specifically its association with AfD advertising strategies.
Timeline
Harris Media managed the 2017 AfD campaign.
Jack Daly was sentenced to prison in 2023.
Payments to Better Mousetrap Digital occurred from April to October 2026.
Jack Daly completed his supervised release in June 2026.
The New York gubernatorial election is scheduled for November 3, 2026.
Market Landscape
This situation underscores the vulnerabilities in modern campaign finance oversight as political organizations increasingly rely on specialized digital subcontractors. It follows a broader trend where campaigns face reputational risks by failing to vet the professional histories of their outsourced advertising and data vendors.
Voters can expect these expenditures to remain a focal point of campaign rhetoric and debate as the November election nears. The disclosure may prompt increased public interest in the specific contractors hired by political candidates.
The takeaway
Understanding how campaign funds are utilized provides essential insight into a candidate's organizational management and judgment. Voters should verify candidate spending disclosures through official state and federal portals to stay informed before casting ballots.
Further reading
Learn more about the evolving standards in political Advertising.
Live Poll
Do you believe political campaigns should be held responsible for the business history of their consultants?










