Defense Rests Case in Faith Hedgepeth Trial
Defense attorneys concluded their case without calling witnesses in the Durham trial.
Updated on Oct. 22, 2026 in Crime — General
Live Poll
Do you believe the criminal court system in your area provides a fair process for defendants?
Defense attorneys rested their case in the trial of Miguel Salguero-Olivares on Wednesday after deciding not to call any witnesses. The defendant also declined to testify in his own defense during the proceedings.
Why it matters
The defense team contends that the state failed to meet its legal burden of proof during the trial. By not calling witnesses, the defense retains the right to present the final closing argument to the jury.
Prosecutors presented testimony from 23 witnesses over a nine-day period before resting their case. The jury of 12 must reach a unanimous agreement to reach a verdict in the case.
The players
Miguel Salguero-Olivares
The defendant in the trial who declined to testify in his own defense.
James Rainsford
A defense attorney representing the defendant who argued that the state failed to meet its burden of proof.
Faith Hedgepeth
The individual whose death is the subject of the ongoing criminal trial in Durham.
The details
Defense attorney James Rainsford asserted that the state has not proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt. The decision for the defendant not to testify is a legal strategy often used to avoid potential self-incrimination or the exposure of past criminal history.
Timeline
Over nine days, prosecutors presented their case and called 23 witnesses.
On Wednesday, the defense rested without calling any witnesses.
On Thursday morning, both sides will deliver closing arguments.
Legal Context
The decision to rest without calling witnesses follows the standard procedural rights of defendants in North Carolina criminal trials. This strategy is frequently utilized in the Durham legal system to maintain specific rights regarding closing arguments and witness cross-examination.
As the trial moves toward closing arguments and jury deliberations, residents in Durham may notice increased activity and security presence around the courthouse. This phase marks the final stage of the trial before the jury determines the outcome.
The takeaway
The defense decision highlights the strategic nature of criminal trials where attorneys aim to maximize their impact during closing arguments. Jurors will now weigh the evidence presented over the past nine days before arriving at a final verdict.
What happens next
Attorneys for both the prosecution and the defense are scheduled to deliver their final closing arguments on Thursday morning. Following these arguments, the jury will begin their formal deliberations.
Further reading
For more on ongoing legal proceedings in the city, visit Durham Crime — General.
Source note: This article includes information reported by 9th Street Journal.
Live Poll
Do you believe the criminal court system in your area provides a fair process for defendants?
