Missouri Dismissed Lawsuit Against Census Bureau
The state dropped its challenge after the Census Bureau proposed rules to exclude certain immigrants from counts.
Updated on Sept. 22, 2026 in Immigration

Live Poll
Should the federal government exclude certain non-citizens from population counts used for congressional apportionment?
Missouri officials have voluntarily dismissed a lawsuit against the Department of Commerce following a shift in federal census policy. The Census Bureau has proposed a rule that incorporates the state's legal arguments to exclude certain immigrants from apportionment.
Why it matters
The proposed rule represents a major change in how the government defines residence and allocates federal representation. By excluding non-permanent residents from the apportionment count, the Census Bureau aligns its methodology with the state of Missouri's recent legal challenge.
The Census Bureau proposed rule would exclude all immigrants except lawful permanent residents from the apportionment count. The proposal also mandates discontinuing the collection of race, ethnicity, and gender attributes during the census.
The players
Missouri
The state filed a lawsuit in January 2026 to challenge how the federal government determines apportionment counts.
Census Bureau
The federal agency is responsible for the decennial census and has proposed new rules regarding immigrant status and data collection.
Department of Commerce
This cabinet-level department oversees the Census Bureau and was the primary defendant in the state's dismissed lawsuit.
The details
The Census Bureau updated its definition of usual residence and proposed adding an immigration status question to the upcoming census. These modifications shift away from the policy established in 1980, which affirmed the counting of all residents, and end the practice of recording race and ethnicity that began in 1790.
Timeline
Missouri filed the lawsuit against the Department of Commerce in January 2026.
A judge granted the request to dismiss the case on September 22, 2026.
The new methodology is expected to be implemented for the 2030 Census.
Political Context
Opponents of the rule, including various advocacy groups, have argued that the Census must remain a neutral tool for counting every person living in the country regardless of status. This move sparks intense debate over the constitutional mandate to count the total population for congressional seat apportionment.
Citizens may see significant changes to the decennial census form, including new questions regarding immigration status and the removal of traditional demographic fields. These shifts could ultimately impact how federal funds and congressional districts are allocated across the state.
The takeaway
This policy pivot highlights the ongoing tension between state-level legal strategies and federal census methodology. Residents should prepare for significant changes in how the government collects demographic information during the next decennial count.
What happens next
The Census Bureau is required to hold a 30-day public comment period regarding the proposed rule changes before they can be finalized.
Further reading
For broader context on these administrative shifts, visit the Immigration section.
Live Poll
Should the federal government exclude certain non-citizens from population counts used for congressional apportionment?










