Missouri Supreme Court Heard Cannabis Licensing Challenge
The court reviewed a dispute over 13 facility licenses following a contested 2019 application process.
Updated on Sept. 24, 2026 in Law

Live Poll
Do you trust the fairness of how state government agencies award business licenses in your area?
The Missouri Supreme Court heard oral arguments regarding whether the state must grant 13 cannabis facility licenses to Hippos LLC. This follows an appellate court ruling that identified flaws in the state's original 2019 application scoring process.
Why it matters
The case highlights concerns over transparency in the state's marijuana licensing process, as claims persist that identical applications received inconsistent scores from the same contractor. A final ruling could reshape the distribution of these licenses and set a precedent for how the state handles administrative scoring disputes.
The dispute involves 13 specific facility licenses evaluated among nearly 2,000 applications during the state's 2019 process. The Missouri Supreme Court is currently reviewing the challenge with its seven presiding judges.
The players
Hippos LLC
This company is the petitioner seeking the court-ordered issuance of 13 marijuana facility licenses.
Scott Fitzpatrick
He is the Missouri State Auditor who issued an audit of the Division of Cannabis Regulation in March 2026.
Administrative Hearing Commission
This state body previously denied the license application appeals filed by the petitioner.
The details
Hippos LLC contends that its applications received inconsistent scores from the same grader, while the state maintains the Administrative Hearing Commission's rescoring process was valid. Evidence presented suggests that scorers were instructed to take limited notes to minimize documentation, a practice that faced scrutiny in a March 2026 audit by Missouri State Auditor Scott Fitzpatrick.
Timeline
The initial marijuana facility licensing process took place in 2019.
An appellate court ruled in favor of Hippos LLC in March 2026.
The Missouri Supreme Court heard oral arguments on September 23, 2026.
Political Context
This case centers on judicial review of the procedures established during Missouri's 2019 marijuana facility license application process. The current legal challenge serves as a direct effort to rectify the specific administrative outcomes and scoring methods utilized during that initial framework.
The outcome of this case could impact the availability and competition levels of cannabis products within Missouri by determining the final number of active licensed facilities. Residents may see shifts in market access depending on whether the court orders the state to issue these 13 licenses.
The takeaway
This case underscores the critical importance of standardized administrative procedures when states manage high-stakes licensing systems. Applicants and business owners should track the court's decision, as it will clarify the standard of review for future state agency application processes.
Further reading
For additional context on the state's ongoing legal battles, read more on Missouri Law.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Missouri Independent.
Live Poll
Do you trust the fairness of how state government agencies award business licenses in your area?










