Wietzema, Cain Vie for Minnesota Judgeship
Incumbent Judge Christina Wietzema faces attorney Christopher Cain in a contested race for Minnesota's Fifth District Court seat 5.
Updated on Nov. 3, 2026 in Criminal Justice

Live Poll
Would you vote to re-elect a sitting judge in your local district court?
Incumbent Judge Christina Wietzema is running against lawyer Christopher Cain for Minnesota's Fifth District Court seat 5. The race is one of a small handful of contested judicial races in Minnesota's district courts.
Why it matters
Judicial candidates cannot run traditional campaign platforms like candidates in other midterm races, which shapes how voters learn about the contest. The winner would serve a six-year term on the Fifth District bench.
The contest is for Minnesota's Fifth District Court seat 5, with Wietzema seeking re-election and Cain challenging her. The source does not report vote totals or the outcome of the race.
The players
Christina Wietzema
Christina Wietzema is the incumbent judge for Minnesota's Fifth District Court seat 5, first appointed to the bench in 2012.
Christopher Cain
Christopher Cain is a lawyer at Kohlmeyer and Hagen in the Mankato area with more than 30 years of legal practice experience.
The details
Wietzema was appointed to the bench in 2012, ran against Nathan Busch in 2014, and was re-elected in 2020. Cain practices at Kohlmeyer and Hagen in the Mankato area and has more than 30 years of experience across criminal, civil, and family law.
Timeline
2012: Wietzema appointed to the bench.
2014: Wietzema runs against Nathan Busch in a contested race.
2020: Wietzema re-elected as judge.
November 3, 2026: Contested judicial race coverage published.
Legal Context
Minnesota judges who are appointed to the bench must later face voters, and contested district court races like this one are relatively uncommon. Judicial candidates are limited in how they may campaign compared with candidates for other offices.
Voters in the Fifth District will decide who fills seat 5 on the district court bench for the next six years. The outcome determines which judge hears cases in that court during that term.
The takeaway
Judicial races are often low-profile, but they determine who decides cases in local courts for years. Reviewing candidates' backgrounds before voting can help voters make informed choices.
Further reading
For more on how judges and prosecutors are selected in the state, see Criminal Justice coverage.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Keyc.
Live Poll
Would you vote to re-elect a sitting judge in your local district court?










