Suffolk DA Clears Officer in Fatal Boston Shooting
Authorities ruled an off-duty officer was justified in the 2025 shooting of an armed man at a local Chick-Fil-A.
Updated on Oct. 21, 2026 in Law Enforcement

Suffolk District Attorney Kevin Hayden has officially cleared an off-duty officer of criminal charges regarding a fatal shooting that occurred in 2025. The officer was determined to have acted in defense of another individual during the incident.
Why it matters
The decision closes a high-profile investigation into a lethal force encounter in a public space. It reinforces legal standards regarding the use of force by off-duty officers when intervening in potential crimes.
The District Attorney ruled the shooting was justified, effectively closing the criminal review of the officer's actions. The investigation focused on the events at the Boylston Street Chick-Fil-A where an armed suspect was fatally shot.
The players
Kevin Hayden
He serves as the Suffolk District Attorney and is responsible for overseeing the prosecution of crimes within the county.
Jose Valenzuela
He is the off-duty officer who was involved in the fatal confrontation on Boylston Street.
The details
Officer Jose Valenzuela fired his handgun after witnessing an armed individual attempting to stab a 17-year-old male inside the restaurant. Investigators confirmed the officer identified himself and ordered the suspect to drop the knife before using lethal force to protect the teenager.
Timeline
March 1, 2025: The fatal shooting occurred at a Chick-Fil-A on Boylston Street.
October 21, 2026: The District Attorney officially ruled that the shooting was legally justified.
Legal Context
This case follows the standard procedural framework for reviewing police-involved shootings in Massachusetts. The ruling aligns with broader legal precedents that justify the use of lethal force when an officer acts to protect a third party from imminent harm.
The official closure of this case provides clarity to residents regarding the incident that took place on Boylston Street. No additional safety advisories or security changes have been issued for the area following the District Attorney's findings.
The takeaway
The decision clarifies the legal outcome of a specific incident but does not signal broader policy shifts. Residents can view this as the conclusion of the criminal inquiry regarding the officer's conduct.
Further reading
For more on legal proceedings and official investigations, visit Boston Law Enforcement.









