Court Affirms Property Ownership for Kokomo Resident
The Indiana Court of Appeals ruled that Gina Behny retains full ownership of her long-term Kokomo home.
Updated on Oct. 30, 2026 in Residential

Live Poll
Should partial property owners have the legal power to force the sale of a shared home?
The Indiana Court of Appeals has upheld a trial court decision awarding full property ownership to Kokomo resident Gina Behny. This ruling brings a conclusion to a legal dispute initiated by Terry Curella regarding the status of the residence.
Why it matters
The decision underscores how courts may prioritize total financial contributions over title-sharing agreements when determining property rights in partition disputes. It prevents the forced sale of a home where one party has overwhelmingly shouldered the financial burden for over two decades.
Gina Behny contributed a total of $275,462.25 to property expenses since 1999, while the house carries an appraised value of $98,000. The court also ordered Terry Curella to pay a $4,307.95 monetary judgment.
The players
Gina Behny
She is the longtime resident and property owner who successfully defended her home ownership in court.
Terry Curella
He is the individual who petitioned the court to partition the property and was ordered to pay a monetary judgment.
Indiana Court of Appeals
This is the judicial body that reviews decisions made by lower courts and affirmed the ownership ruling.
The details
After Behny initially purchased the home in 1999, Gregg Curella was added to the title in 2001 before transferring his interest to Terry Curella in 2021. The appellate court found no clear error in the trial court's decision to award the property to Behny based on the massive disparity in mortgage and maintenance payments made over 25 years.
Timeline
Gina Behny purchased the Kokomo home in 1999.
Gregg Curella transferred his interest to Terry Curella in January 2021.
Terry Curella petitioned to partition the property by sale in April 2022.
A trial court held a bench trial on August 28, 2024.
The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the ruling on October 29, 2026.
Culture Shift
This case highlights the tension between formal property titles and the practical, long-term financial reality of shared home maintenance. It follows a growing trend of courts prioritizing documented investment histories when applying the Indiana law governing partition of real property.
Residents should ensure that all financial contributions to a shared home are thoroughly documented to protect their interests in future legal disputes. This ruling clarifies that courts may consider individual expense records when deciding if a property should be sold or retained.
The takeaway
Property owners should maintain clear records of all mortgage and repair payments to substantiate ownership claims. Even with multiple names on a title, significant disparities in financial support can influence judicial decisions during a partition request.
Further reading
For more information on local market trends and property disputes, see the Residential section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by The Times of India.
Live Poll
Should partial property owners have the legal power to force the sale of a shared home?










