Cyabra Flags Bot Activity in Georgia Governor Race

Hundreds of potentially inauthentic accounts targeted both candidates in Georgia's governor race, according to Cyabra's analysis of X activity.

Updated on Nov. 3, 2026 in Artificial Intelligence

Cyabra Flags Bot Activity in Georgia Governor Race

Live Poll

Do you trust political posts you see on social media this election season?

Cyabra reported that potentially inauthentic accounts targeted both candidates in Georgia's governor race, with as many as 1 in 4 replies on X during debate week coming from such accounts. The accounts posted within seconds of one another and responded to the same conversations.

Why it matters

The findings suggest coordinated online activity may be shaping political conversation ahead of Georgia voters heading to the polls. Artificial intelligence has made it easier and cheaper to operate large numbers of accounts, raising concerns about manipulation of political discourse.

Cyabra found that hundreds of accounts showed signs of coordinated activity, with some posting within seconds of one another and responding to the same conversations. Accounts identified inflammatory real conversations and amplified them through replies attacking both candidates.

The players

Cyabra

Cyabra is a company that analyzes online activity to detect signs of manipulation, including coordinated inauthentic behavior on social media platforms.

The details

Cyabra, a company that analyzes online activity for signs of manipulation, examined multiple races across the country this election cycle, including Georgia's governor race. The accounts identified inflammatory conversations and amplified them through responses that attacked both candidates.

Debate week: period when as many as 1 in 4 X replies were inauthentic.
Tuesday: Georgia voters head to the polls on election day.

The Tech Race

Artificial intelligence has lowered the cost of operating networks of social media accounts, extending a broader arms race between platforms and those seeking to manipulate online discourse. This election-cycle analysis shows that race now reaching state-level contests such as Georgia's governor race.

Voters following Georgia's governor race on X may encounter a substantial share of replies from inauthentic accounts. Checking whether accounts are verified or have a consistent posting history can help readers judge the credibility of political replies they see.

The takeaway

Political conversation online can be shaped by accounts that are not what they appear to be. Readers should weigh heated replies cautiously and look to primary candidate statements and reporting from established outlets.