Appeals Court Revives Neighbor's Falling Tree Lawsuit

A Florida appeals court reinstated a negligence claim over a rotten oak tree that fell onto a neighboring house in 2022.

Updated on Nov. 9, 2026 in Accidents

Appeals Court Revives Neighbor's Falling Tree Lawsuit

Live Poll

Should property owners be held liable when a rotten tree on their land damages a neighbor's home?

The Florida District Courts of Appeal overturned a trial court ruling and revived Richard Vaughan's negligence claim against USMI Properties Five, LLC. Vaughan's house was damaged in 2022 when a rotten oak tree on USMI's land fell onto it.

Why it matters

The appeals court held that a property owner may owe a legal duty to neighbors when a tree is known to be dangerous, even if the tree is not healthy. The case was sent back for further proceedings in Florida courts.

The appeals court reversed the trial court's dismissal of the negligence claim and sent the case back for further proceedings. The separate negligence-per-se claim was dismissed before the appeal, and the factual question of the owner's knowledge has not yet been resolved.

The players

Richard Vaughan

Richard Vaughan is the homeowner whose house was damaged when a rotten oak tree fell from the neighboring USMI property in 2022.

USMI Properties Five, LLC

USMI Properties Five, LLC is the property owner whose rotten oak tree fell onto Vaughan's home, and which won dismissal at the trial court before the ruling was reversed.

The details

Tenants at the adjoining USMI property allegedly repeatedly reported falling branches to the owner, who allegedly took no effective action. The complaint alleged the tree had been deteriorating for years before it fell onto Vaughan's house in 2022.

Years before 2022: the tree allegedly deteriorated and tenants reported falling branches.
2022: the rotten oak fell onto Vaughan's house.
November 6, 2026: the appeals court overturned the dismissal and revived the claim.

Legal Context

The ruling distinguishes earlier Florida decisions that addressed healthy trees, which generally do not expose owners to liability for falls. The appeals court held that those cases do not automatically shield owners of knowingly dangerous, decaying trees from claims by neighbors.

Property owners in Florida may face liability claims from neighbors if they know a tree on their land is decaying and dangerous. Residents with large trees near their homes may want to document any warnings they have given neighbors about hazardous limbs.

The takeaway

Owners who know a tree is decaying may need to act to reduce the risk of harm to neighboring property. The ruling leaves the factual question of what the owner knew to be decided later.