Bay County Officials Opposed Amendment 3

Local leaders held a press conference to warn voters about the potential impact of the ballot measure.

Updated on Oct. 13, 2026 in City Hall

Bold flat-color editorial illustration of a steel bridge spanning a concrete rift, symbolizing the threat of fiscal instability. — Local officials in Bay County are formally campaigning against Amendment 3, citing potential budget shortfalls that threaten public service funding statewide. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should voters in your community reject proposed tax measures that could reduce funding for public services?

Local officials in Bay County gathered at the public library to formally urge residents to vote against Amendment 3. The group warns that the proposed measure could force significant budget cuts to essential public services throughout the state.

Why it matters

Opponents argue that the amendment lacks a clear strategy for replacing lost local government revenue. They claim this shortfall could threaten funding for public safety, including police and fire departments, while potentially triggering new tax burdens.

The opposition campaign highlights that Amendment 3 could jeopardize funding for police and fire departments. Officials emphasize that the measure lacks a concrete plan to offset the projected reduction in local government revenue.

The players

Doug Moore

He serves as a Bay County Commissioner and participated in the opposition event.

Janice Lucas

She is a Bay County Commissioner who spoke out against the amendment.

Shott Clemons

He is a local official involved in the campaign to urge a no vote.

Greg Brudnicki

He is a local leader who joined the press conference to discuss the measure.

Vote No on Amendment 3 Campaign

This organization managed the press conference and distributed information regarding the proposal.

The details

The Vote No on Amendment 3 Campaign organized the event to express concerns about the long-term financial stability of local jurisdictions. Local leaders emphasized that the measure poses a direct threat to the maintenance of critical infrastructure and services for residents.

October 12, 2026: A flood-damaged home underwent ceremonial demolition.
October 13, 2026: Officials held a press conference outside the Bay County Public Library.
November 2026: Voters will head to the polls for the 2026 Midterm Elections.

Political Context

Supporters of Amendment 3 often argue that the measure is necessary to modernize state oversight of local governance. This pushback from local officials reflects a broader conflict between state-level ballot initiatives and municipal budgetary autonomy.

The outcome of this vote could lead to significant changes in the funding available for public safety and essential local services in your community. Residents should evaluate how potential budget shifts might impact their access to fire and police protection.

The takeaway

Voters should carefully examine the long-term financial consequences of ballot amendments on their local government's ability to fund essential services. Reviewing non-partisan budget analyses can help residents understand the trade-offs involved before heading to the polls in November.