Stronger Safer Nation Spent Millions Targeting Nixon
The political action committee has funneled nearly $2.7 million into advertisements opposing candidate Angie Nixon.
Updated on Sept. 24, 2026 in Elections
Live Poll
Do you believe unlimited political spending by super PACs undermines the fairness of federal elections?
The political action committee Stronger Safer Nation has deployed nearly $2.7 million for ad campaigns criticizing Florida Senate candidate Angie Nixon. This spending coincides with polling data showing Ashley Moody holding a 4 percentage point lead in the race.
Why it matters
The massive infusion of capital into attack ads highlights the escalating financial disparity as the campaign enters its final stretch. With significant remaining resources available to the committee, the intervention underscores the high stakes of the election.
Stronger Safer Nation has raised over $12 million, including $400,000 from RAI Services Co. and $100,000 from United States Sugar Corp. Ashley Moody has raised more than $14 million total for her campaign.
The players
Angie Nixon
She is a political candidate currently running in the Florida Senate race.
Ashley Moody
She is a political candidate currently leading in the Florida Senate polling averages.
Stronger Safer Nation
This is a political action committee that raises funds for independent political activity.
Ken Griffin
He is a notable donor who has contributed to the Stronger Safer Nation committee.
Paul Elliott Singer
He is a prominent financial backer who has made donations to Stronger Safer Nation.
The details
Operating as a committee independent of direct candidate coordination, the PAC has characterized Angie Nixon as anti-police in its recent messaging. These expenditures represent a fraction of the $9 million currently sitting in the committee's coffers.
Timeline
September 24, 2026: The reported findings were published.
Political Context
The independence of committees like Stronger Safer Nation reflects the evolving landscape of campaign finance regulation under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. While PACs provide a mechanism for large-scale funding, critics argue that such independent spending creates an unbalanced playing field for candidates like Angie Nixon who rely on more traditional fundraising.
The flood of campaign ads will likely increase the visibility of these political messages for all Florida voters during the final weeks of the cycle. Voters should remain aware that the messaging is funded by independent groups rather than the candidates themselves.
The takeaway
The significant financial disparity between candidates and independent committees remains a dominant feature of the current election cycle. Voters are encouraged to look beyond attack advertisements and evaluate the full range of candidate platforms.
Further reading
For more background on the state's upcoming races, visit the Elections section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Tampa Bay Times.
Live Poll
Do you believe unlimited political spending by super PACs undermines the fairness of federal elections?
