Mia Goth Requested Remote Deposition in Lawsuit

The actress cited safety concerns in court filings regarding an ongoing legal dispute with a background actor.

Updated on Sept. 24, 2026 in Horror

Mia Goth Requested Remote Deposition in Lawsuit

Mia Goth has filed a declaration in Los Angeles County Superior Court requesting a remote deposition for a lawsuit filed by James Hunter. Hunter, an extra on a 2023 film production, alleges that Goth kicked him in the head and mocked him on set.

Why it matters

The legal battle highlights ongoing tensions regarding workplace safety and conduct on film sets. Goth maintains that in-person proceedings could compromise her safety due to the animosity expressed by the plaintiff.

James Hunter is seeking $250,000 in damages following his removal from the 2023 production. Hunter previously completed an 8-hour in-person deposition regarding his claims.

The players

Mia Goth

She is an actress and producer known for her work in the horror genre.

James Hunter

He is a background actor who worked on the film production in 2023.

Ti West

He is a filmmaker and director who is named as a defendant in the lawsuit.

A24

This is an independent entertainment company involved in the film production.

The details

Goth cited specific privacy and safety concerns, alleging that Hunter attempted to obtain information about her residence and has publicly demonstrated hostility. The plaintiff, who was subject to an unrelated restraining order, insists that Goth should appear in person for questioning in April 2027.

James Hunter worked as an extra on the set in 2023.
The initial complaint was filed by Hunter in January 2024.
Mia Goth filed the request for a remote deposition on September 18, 2026.
Hunter submitted court documents regarding the deposition on September 22, 2026.
Hunter requested that Goth appear in person for a deposition in April 2027.

Industry Dynamics

The legal dispute follows a pattern set by the 2024 lawsuit filings against A24 and Ti West regarding set safety. This high-profile conflict underscores the evolving scrutiny of on-set conduct and production accountability in the modern entertainment landscape.

The progression of this litigation could influence how future film sets manage interpersonal conduct and safety protocols. Fans may see changes in production transparency as the legal process moves through the court system.

The takeaway

This case serves as a reminder of the complex legal intersections between film production safety and individual privacy. Readers should note that court-ordered depositions often determine the trajectory of civil litigation outcomes.