Former Phoenix Officers Added to Brady List
Two fired officers were placed on the disclosure list following their arrests for kidnapping and assault.
Updated on Sept. 21, 2026 in Law Enforcement
Live Poll
Should police officers with documented misconduct records be permitted to testify in criminal trials?
Prosecutors added two former Phoenix Police Department officers to the Brady list, which tracks personnel with documented histories of misconduct. The move follows the firing and arrest of Antonio Felix and Luis Vasquez Jr. for kidnapping and assaulting a couple during an unreported traffic stop.
Why it matters
The Brady list serves to fulfill legal disclosure requirements regarding the credibility of potential witnesses in criminal cases. Including these officers ensures that defense attorneys are notified of their past misconduct, which is essential to upholding judicial integrity.
Antonio Felix and Luis Vasquez Jr. were added to the list after their arrests on suspicion of kidnapping and assault. Their addition to the Brady list formalizes the disclosure of their past conduct for any future legal proceedings.
The players
Antonio Felix
He is a former Phoenix police officer who served nine years with the department before being fired.
Luis Vasquez Jr.
He is a former Phoenix police officer who served eight years with the department before his termination.
Phoenix Police Department
This is the municipal law enforcement agency that employed both officers prior to their arrests and subsequent firing.
The details
Prosecutors acted to include both men on the list to remain in compliance with mandatory disclosure protocols involving officer credibility. The officers were dismissed from the Phoenix Police Department following allegations that they kidnapped and assaulted a couple during a traffic stop that was never reported.
Timeline
The Supreme Court established the foundational Brady disclosure ruling in 1963.
The officers were added to the list on September 21, 2026.
Legal Context
The addition of these officers to the disclosure list follows a precedent set by the 1963 Brady v. Maryland Supreme Court ruling. This legal standard ensures that evidence of officer misconduct must be disclosed to defense teams to maintain constitutional due process.
The formal addition of these officers to the Brady list ensures that their past actions are transparently documented for future court cases. Residents may expect continued oversight as the city processes the legal fallout from the officers' misconduct and subsequent termination.
The takeaway
Maintaining a Brady list is a critical mechanism for the justice system to manage and track officer credibility. Transparency in these disclosures remains a vital component of public trust and legal fairness for all citizens.
Further reading
Learn more about local oversight by visiting Law Enforcement.
Source note: This article includes information reported by KJZZ.
Live Poll
Should police officers with documented misconduct records be permitted to testify in criminal trials?
