State Opposed Tom Crosby Grand Jury Record Access

Prosecutors argued that the Cochise County official failed to justify unsealing testimony from a separate criminal case.

Updated on Sept. 18, 2026 in Criminal Justice

Bold flat-color editorial illustration showing a monolithic geometric architectural silhouette, representing institutional legal authority.
State prosecutors moved to block Cochise County official Tom Crosby from accessing sealed grand jury transcripts in his ongoing criminal election case. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should defendants be allowed to access sealed grand jury testimony from unrelated legal cases?

Attorneys for the state have moved to block Tom Crosby from accessing sealed grand jury transcripts related to an unrelated criminal case. Crosby currently faces charges connected to delays in the 2022 election certification.

Why it matters

The state contends that the defendant has failed to demonstrate a sufficient legal need to unseal the records. Prosecutors also argue the request for a remand of the case to the grand jury is now legally futile due to expired timelines.

The state filed a formal opposition in Maricopa County Superior Court to deny Crosby access to records from a sealed criminal case. The defendant remains ineligible to view the files because the legal timeline for remanding the case has passed.

The players

Tom Crosby

He is a Cochise County official who is currently facing criminal charges related to the 2022 election cycle.

The details

Prosecutors argued in a Phoenix hearing that the request should be denied because it lacks legal merit. Tom Crosby is seeking dismissal of criminal charges resulting from his role in the 2022 election certification delay in Cochise County.

Timeline

  1. The election certification delay occurred in 2022.

Legal Context

This dispute marks a procedural development in the long-running litigation stemming from the 2022 Cochise County election certification delay. It highlights the restrictive standards courts apply when defendants seek to unseal grand jury testimony from unrelated criminal files.

The proceedings in Phoenix keep the details surrounding the 2022 election certification controversy at the center of local court activity. Residents can expect continued legal oversight as the judiciary manages these ongoing filings and motions.

The takeaway

The court's decision on this motion will determine the boundaries of discovery in high-profile local election cases. Accessing sealed testimony requires meeting strict legal thresholds that defendants often struggle to satisfy.

Further reading

For more information on legal proceedings, visit the Criminal Justice section.

Live Poll

Should defendants be allowed to access sealed grand jury testimony from unrelated legal cases?