Birmingham City Council Condemned Church Property

The city moved to condemn a former church on Dowell Avenue after it was labeled a public nuisance.

Updated on Oct. 8, 2026 in City Hall

Birmingham City Council Condemned Church Property

Live Poll

Should cities allow building owners more time to rehabilitate condemned properties instead of ordering demolition?

On September 22, 2026, the Birmingham City Council voted to condemn the former Powderly 32nd Street Baptist Church located at 3012 Dowell Avenue Southwest. The site remains on the city's public nuisance list.

Why it matters

The property was condemned due to its designation as a public nuisance, but the new owner is seeking to rehabilitate the structure for community use. Converting the site could provide needed resources for students in the area.

The property at 3012 Dowell Avenue Southwest was officially placed on the city's public nuisance list prior to the council's vote. The owner, Nathan Thompson, has requested 120 days to perform a full structural evaluation and submit a repair plan.

The players

Birmingham City Council

This is the governing legislative body for the city of Birmingham that manages municipal policy and zoning enforcement.

Nathan Thompson

He is the property owner who inherited the church site through his father's estate and is seeking to repurpose it.

The details

The owner acquired the property through his father's estate just four days before the condemnation vote occurred. He has since provided photographs demonstrating that vegetation and debris have been cleared from the grounds.

September 18, 2026: Nathan Thompson acquired the church property.
September 22, 2026: Birmingham City Council voted to condemn the property.
October 6, 2026: Thompson appeared before the City Council to request more time.

Political Context

Opponents of the condemnation argue that the city should prioritize adaptive reuse for neighborhood revitalization rather than immediate demolition. Local advocates claim that rigid enforcement of the public nuisance ordinance often stifles private efforts to restore historical community sites.

Residents may see a change in the neighborhood landscape if the building is demolished or eventually renovated. The outcome will determine whether the site becomes a new STEM center or remains a vacant nuisance property under city control.

The takeaway

The city faces a balance between strictly enforcing safety codes and allowing property owners time to revitalize neglected sites. Residents should monitor future council meetings to see if the requested extension is granted for the project.