Alabama Supreme Court Backs Agent in Pharmacy Case
The court ruled an insurance agent is not liable after a pharmacy owner failed to read his own policy exclusions.
Updated on Oct. 21, 2026 in Insurance
Live Poll
Should customers bear full responsibility for not reading every detail of their insurance policies?
The Alabama Supreme Court determined that an insurance agent holds no liability for a pharmacy's lack of professional coverage following a medication error. The court ruled that the pharmacy owner was contributorily negligent for failing to review his policy exclusions.
Why it matters
The ruling emphasizes the legal obligation of policyholders to personally review their coverage terms. It clarifies that reliance on an agent does not absolve business owners of their responsibility to understand policy limitations.
A $4.75 million judgment was levied against the pharmacy after a technician's input error made a medication 1,000 times stronger than intended. This led to a patient ingesting a tablespoon of belladonna.
The players
Alabama Supreme Court
This is the highest judicial tribunal in Alabama and holds final authority over state law interpretations.
Nationwide
Nationwide is a large insurance and financial services company that provides various commercial and personal coverage products.
Baldo-Downs Insurance
Baldo-Downs is a Tuscaloosa-based agency involved in the litigation regarding the pharmacy's insurance coverage.
The details
The pharmacy owner sued Nationwide and the Baldo-Downs Insurance agency after discovering his general liability policy excluded professional services. The court noted that the owner replaced his prior policy with a facially similar one without investigating whether professional liability was included.
Timeline
In 2008, the insurance agent obtained a general liability policy for the pharmacy.
In 2013, a patient suffered belladonna poisoning due to a medication error.
On October 9, 2026, the Alabama Supreme Court issued its opinion on the case.
Market Dynamics
This ruling follows the established state legal precedent of the doctrine of contributory negligence by denying recovery to a party who failed to exercise reasonable care for their own protection. It reinforces the shift toward personal responsibility in complex insurance contracts.
Business owners in Alabama must ensure they explicitly confirm that their insurance policies cover professional services rather than relying on agents. Failure to read policy exclusions can leave a business fully responsible for multi-million dollar judgments.
The takeaway
Business owners should always request a full copy of their insurance policy and manually verify all coverage exclusions. Relying solely on a verbal summary from an agent may not hold up as a legal defense in court if a dispute arises.
Further reading
For more on legal standards and coverage expectations, visit Alabama Insurance.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Insurance Journal.
Live Poll
Should customers bear full responsibility for not reading every detail of their insurance policies?
