Alabama Supreme Court Upholds Verdict Against Envoy Air
The court confirmed a liability finding for retaliatory firing but ordered further review of the $675,000 damages award.
Updated on Oct. 16, 2026 in Human Resources

Live Poll
Should workers compensation laws protect employees from termination even when falsification is alleged?
The Alabama Supreme Court has upheld a jury verdict finding Envoy Air liable for the retaliatory firing of Jada Creagh. While the liability ruling stands, the court has directed the trial court to provide a written explanation for maintaining the $675,000 damages award.
Why it matters
The case centers on allegations that Envoy Air fired Creagh in retaliation for filing a workers compensation claim after a shoulder injury. The employer had contended the termination was based on the employee allegedly falsifying a doctor's note regarding lifting restrictions.
The jury award includes $250,000 for mental anguish and $425,000 in punitive damages. The dispute originated from a 10-pound lifting restriction compared to the job requirement of 50 pounds.
The players
Jada Creagh
She is the former employee who successfully sued Envoy Air for retaliatory discharge.
Envoy Air
This is a regional airline subsidiary of American Airlines Group headquartered in Irving, Texas.
Alabama Supreme Court
This is the highest judicial body in Alabama responsible for interpreting state law and reviewing lower court decisions.
The details
Evidence presented suggested a station manager at Mobile Regional Airport altered a medical note to justify the dismissal, while human resources merely authorized the firing. Four justices dissented from the majority opinion delivered by the Alabama Supreme Court.
Timeline
Oct. 25, 2018: Jada Creagh suffered a shoulder injury at work.
Nov. 2018: Creagh returned to work with lifting restrictions.
Jan. 7, 2019: Envoy Air terminated Jada Creagh's employment.
Oct. 16, 2026: The Alabama Supreme Court issued the ruling.
Market Landscape
This case highlights the growing legal risks companies face when managing workplace injury claims and employee separations. It reflects an industry trend where human resources practices at regional facilities are increasingly scrutinized for alignment with state employment statutes.
This decision reinforces the legal protections for employees who file workers compensation claims in Alabama. Companies may adjust their internal HR protocols for handling medical documentation to avoid similar liability judgments.
The takeaway
Employers should ensure that all disciplinary actions are thoroughly documented and consistent with established medical guidance. Employees injured on the job are reminded that filing for compensation is a protected activity under state law.
Further reading
For more on workplace disputes and legal standards, visit the Alabama Human Resources section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Business Insurance.
Live Poll
Should workers compensation laws protect employees from termination even when falsification is alleged?










