NYC Metro Ranks Most Prosperous in Index
The Geography of Prosperity Index scores the nation's 250 largest urban areas across five categories, with The Villages in Florida ranking lowest.
Updated on Nov. 4, 2026 in Regional Economics
Live Poll
Do you think your community is set up well for people to succeed?
The Geography of Prosperity Index ranked the New York City-Jersey City-Newark metro area as the most prosperous among the nation's 250 largest urban areas. The Villages in Florida scored lowest overall.
Why it matters
The index assigns each metro a score across population renewal, climate resilience, automation readiness, social cohesion, and governance and foresight, offering a structured comparison of affluence across the country. For the United States as a whole, it provides a framework for understanding how prosperity is distributed geographically.
The New York City-Newark metro scored 95 out of 100 for social cohesion and 82 for climate resilience, while its lowest category score was 40 for governance and foresight. The Villages scored 2 for population renewal, and about 85% of its residents are 65 or older.
The players
Geography of Prosperity Index
A metro-area ranking index that scores the nation's 250 largest urban areas on affluence across five categories.
The details
The index draws on federal agency data, academic research, and proprietary resources to evaluate metros across five categories. Durham, North Carolina ranked second, followed by Ann Arbor, Michigan, Boston, Seattle and Tacoma, and Washington, D.C.-Arlington, Virginia.
Timeline
The index will add an affordability measure in 2027.
The index will study freedoms for people of color, women, and the LGBTQ community in 2028.
Regional Economics Context
The Geography of Prosperity Index's five-category framework, covering population renewal, climate resilience, automation readiness, social cohesion, and governance and foresight, produced this first national ranking of the 250 largest metros. Its planned additions of an affordability measure in 2027 and a study of freedoms for people of color, women, and the LGBTQ community in 2028 will extend the framework beyond its current categories.
Residents deciding where to live can use metro-level scores in social cohesion, climate resilience, and governance to compare communities. The index's planned affordability measure in 2027 will add a direct cost-of-living dimension to these comparisons.
The takeaway
Metro rankings can reveal sharp differences in social cohesion and governance even among large urban areas, so readers should look beyond a single overall score. Comparing category-level results gives a clearer picture of where a community stands.
What happens next
The index will add an affordability measure in 2027 and study freedoms for people of color, women, and the LGBTQ community in 2028.
Further reading
For related coverage, see Regional Economics on how prosperity varies across metro areas.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Smart Cities Dive.
Live Poll
Do you think your community is set up well for people to succeed?
