Appeals Court Upholds Buy America Waiver Rules
The D.C. Circuit Court ruled that domestic manufacturers must prove current production capacity to challenge federal procurement waivers.
Updated on Oct. 15, 2026 in Manufacturing
Live Poll
Should federal projects require domestic manufacturing even if it restricts the availability of new technology?
The D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that companies must demonstrate existing domestic production capabilities to block federal Buy America waiver determinations. The decision stems from a challenge by Alstom Transportation regarding a $12 billion high-speed rail project between California and Nevada.
Why it matters
The ruling limits the ability of manufacturers to contest foreign sourcing waivers by requiring proof of current, rather than prospective, domestic production. This standard clarifies procurement guidelines for federal agencies tasked with managing infrastructure funding projects.
The federal government provided $3 billion in funding for the $12 billion rail line connecting Rancho Cucamonga and Las Vegas, which requires 10 high-speed trains. Siemens was granted a waiver to manufacture two of these units in Europe.
The players
Alstom Transportation
This multinational company specializes in rail transport and provides high-speed train technology for global infrastructure projects.
Federal Railroad Administration
This agency is a branch of the U.S. Department of Transportation responsible for enforcing rail safety and managing federal rail funding programs.
Siemens
This global technology firm manufactures a wide range of industrial and transportation equipment including high-speed rail systems.
The details
Alstom Transportation challenged the waiver after the Federal Railroad Administration determined no domestic manufacturer met the 186 mph speed requirement at the time of the request. The court held that potential future production cannot satisfy the statutory requirements for domestic availability.
Timeline
October 2026: The Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued its decision.
Market Landscape
This ruling clarifies the legal standing of manufacturers in challenging procurement decisions, potentially reducing litigation against federal agencies. It solidifies the current regulatory environment where domestic manufacturers must prove existing capabilities to disrupt foreign sourcing contracts.
The ruling establishes a higher legal hurdle for companies attempting to block procurement waivers, which may streamline the delivery of large-scale federal infrastructure projects. Customers and taxpayers may see fewer legal delays in the deployment of taxpayer-funded transit systems.
The takeaway
This decision prioritizes the immediate, demonstrated capability of domestic firms over future promises when interpreting federal procurement law. Companies looking to challenge future waivers will now need to ensure they have production capacity in place before filing legal complaints.
What happens next
The FAR Council is expected to release a proposed rule regarding Buy American nonavailability waivers in the future.
Further reading
Learn more about federal infrastructure standards on the United States Manufacturing page.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Federal News Network.
Live Poll
Should federal projects require domestic manufacturing even if it restricts the availability of new technology?
