Second Circuit Revived Clerk Wage Lawsuit
The court ruled that mandatory pre-shift work is compensable under federal labor law.
Updated on Oct. 13, 2026 in Unions
Live Poll
Should federal law require companies to pay employees for mandatory pre-shift preparation time?
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued a split decision reviving an unpaid wage lawsuit brought by a former clerk against Lidl US LLC. The ruling overturns a prior district court dismissal that had originally excluded pre-shift work claims from Fair Labor Standards Act protections.
Why it matters
The decision clarifies that mandatory reporting to a worksite before a shift begins constitutes compensable activity. This precedent strengthens the protections for hourly employees seeking payment for required time spent at their job locations.
The Second Circuit panel ruled that mandatory pre-shift activities are covered under the Fair Labor Standards Act, reversing a lower court's decision. The legal status of these unpaid wage claims is now active and returning to the judicial process.
The players
Second Circuit Court of Appeals
This is a federal court that holds jurisdiction over legal appeals from district courts in New York, Connecticut, and Vermont.
Lidl US LLC
This is an international grocery retailer that operates numerous store locations across the United States.
Sandra Santos
She is the former clerk who initiated the lawsuit regarding unpaid wages.
The details
The court determined that the policy requiring employees to report to work sites before their official start times qualifies as compensable activity. A previous district judge had determined the claims fell outside the scope of federal wage laws, but the appellate panel majority disagreed with that assessment.
Timeline
October 12, 2026: The Second Circuit panel issued its ruling.
Political Context
Opponents of expanded labor mandates often argue that rigid interpretations of the Fair Labor Standards Act may increase operational costs for retail businesses. Industry groups have historically sought clarity on when work-related site reporting obligations begin to avoid potential class-action litigation.
Employees who are required to report for work duties before their official start times may now have a stronger legal basis for claiming those minutes as paid labor. This ruling could prompt businesses to re-evaluate their attendance policies to ensure compliance with federal wage regulations.
The takeaway
Workers should track all time spent on premises when their employer mandates arrival before the shift clock officially starts. Documenting these requirements can be essential for asserting rights under federal labor laws if disputes over compensation arise.
Further reading
For more information on current labor legal standards, visit the Unions section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Bloomberglaw.
Live Poll
Should federal law require companies to pay employees for mandatory pre-shift preparation time?
