Judge Denied Antitrust Lawsuit Reconsideration
A federal court dismissed the legal challenge from former Michigan football players against the NCAA.
Updated on Sept. 30, 2026 in Football
Live Poll
Should the NCAA be held liable for compensation practices from over a decade ago?
A federal judge has denied a motion for reconsideration from former University of Michigan football players in their antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA. The court upheld its previous dismissal, citing that the legal claims were filed too late.
Why it matters
The ruling underscores the importance of legal timelines in antitrust litigation, as the court determined the claims were brought 12 years after they accrued. By finding the initiation of the lawsuit grossly untimely, the court effectively ended the plaintiffs' attempt to challenge historical NCAA student-athlete compensation policies.
Judge Terrence G. Berg ruled that the legal claims accrued by 2012 when the last plaintiff could have assigned publicity rights to the NCAA. The action was dismissed because it was filed 12 years after those claims initially accrued.
The players
Terrence G. Berg
He is a U.S. District Judge who presided over the antitrust lawsuit and issued the ruling.
NCAA
The National Collegiate Athletic Association is the governing body for college sports in the United States.
University of Michigan
This is a public research university where the former football players involved in the lawsuit played.
The details
The court determined that the lawsuit was filed well past the statute of limitations for the antitrust allegations. Consequently, Judge Terrence G. Berg denied the plaintiffs' request to revisit the dismissal of their action against the governing body.
Timeline
The legal claims against the NCAA accrued in 2012.
A federal judge denied the request for reconsideration on September 30, 2026.
Season Trajectory
This ruling solidifies the legal boundaries for historic antitrust challenges within the college sports ecosystem. It limits the ability of former athletes to contest past compensation structures, potentially narrowing the scope of future litigation against the NCAA.
The dismissal prevents any potential financial windfall that former Michigan football players sought through this specific antitrust claim. It also serves as a definitive legal precedent confirming that claims regarding historical publicity rights are subject to strict filing deadlines.
The takeaway
Legal challenges regarding college athlete compensation must be filed within specific timeframes to be considered by the court. Plaintiffs and their counsel should prioritize timely filings to ensure that historical grievances do not become procedurally barred.
Further reading
For more information on legal and regulatory issues within the sport, visit the Football section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Mlex.
Live Poll
Should the NCAA be held liable for compensation practices from over a decade ago?
