Addo-Carr Meets Eels Board Over Future

The Parramatta winger met the board after a disputed cocaine test and a breach notice from the club.

Updated on Nov. 4, 2026 in Substance Abuse

Live Poll

Should a pro athlete who tests positive for drugs be given a second chance by his team?

Josh Addo-Carr met with the Parramatta Eels board on Monday night about his future at the club. The meeting follows an alleged positive cocaine result from a September roadside drug test, which Addo-Carr reportedly disputed after a negative secondary sample.

Why it matters

The outcome will determine whether the club keeps or moves on from one of its prominent players amid a substance-related dispute. The case also highlights how a disputed roadside result can affect a player's livelihood, including sponsorships, before a final determination.

The evidence is a roadside drug test that Addo-Carr reportedly disputed with a negative secondary sample, and he has lost nearly $400,000 in endorsement deals since. The Eels' decision is expected later this week, and the final determination on the result remains unresolved.

The players

Josh Addo-Carr

A winger who scored 27 tries for Parramatta under coach Jason Ryles, and whose career has included earlier clubs.

Parramatta Eels

The NRL club that issued the breach notice and is weighing Addo-Carr's future at the club.

The details

Addo-Carr was represented by lawyer Elias Tabchouri, with agent Mario Tartak present, when he met the board. The club issued a breach notice over the September incident, and Addo-Carr has checked himself into a rehabilitation clinic despite the negative B sample.

2024: Addo-Carr failed a random roadside drug test and was sacked by the Bulldogs.
September: Addo-Carr allegedly tested positive for cocaine in a roadside test.
Monday: Addo-Carr met the Eels board after a negative secondary sample emerged.
This week: The Eels are expected to announce a decision on his future.

Penalty Framework

Under the NRL's drug policy, a confirmed positive secondary sample carries a potential 12-game ban, which is the threshold that makes the disputed result consequential. Addo-Carr's case turns on whether the negative secondary sample is accepted over the initial roadside result.

Fans can follow the Eels' decision this week, which will shape whether Addo-Carr remains available for the club. The outcome also affects which players may become available on the open market for fantasy and club planning.

The takeaway

A disputed roadside test can carry lasting consequences before any final ruling, so readers should watch whether a negative secondary sample is accepted in the final outcome. The case shows why secondary testing matters when a first result is contested.

What happens next

The Parramatta Eels are expected to announce their decision on Addo-Carr's future later this week. Players return to prepare for pre-season training ahead of the 2027 season.