Belt and Road Projects Face Setbacks in South Asia
China Merchants Port Holdings exits a $392 million Colombo logistics joint venture as financing and security challenges mount across the region.
Updated on Nov. 11, 2026 in Business Strategy

Live Poll
Do you think large foreign-funded infrastructure projects usually benefit ordinary citizens?
China Merchants Port Holdings withdrew from a $392 million joint venture to develop a logistics hub at the Port of Colombo in Sri Lanka. The move comes as China's Belt and Road Initiative faces implementation challenges across South Asia.
Why it matters
The withdrawal highlights the financing pressures and implementation hurdles facing large infrastructure projects tied to China's Belt and Road Initiative. Analysts track such setbacks to understand the limits of Chinese-backed investment in the region.
The withdrawn joint venture was valued at $392 million, a figure that does not indicate how much capital had already been committed. The Hambantota port's 99-year lease, granted in 2017, remains a reference point for the scale of long-term Chinese port arrangements in Sri Lanka.
The players
China Merchants Port Holdings
A Chinese port operator and investor that has built and managed container terminals and logistics facilities across several countries as part of China's maritime and infrastructure expansion.
Tarique Rahman
Bangladesh's Prime Minister, whose government is weighing relations with both Japan and China as foreign investment in the country's infrastructure continues.
The details
China Merchants Port Holdings pulled out of the Colombo logistics hub venture, which was valued at $392 million. The episode sits alongside wider difficulties, including financing strains and security concerns that have complicated the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and BRI-linked projects in Nepal, Bangladesh and the Maldives.
Timeline
2017: Sri Lanka leased the Hambantota port to a Chinese company for 99 years.
This week: Bangladeshi Prime Minister Tarique Rahman traveled to Japan.
Business Strategy Context
The Port of Colombo withdrawal and the Hambantota lease sit within the broader Belt and Road Initiative, which has financed port and corridor projects across South Asia. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor shows how those ambitions have run into economic instability and security problems on the ground.
For businesses weighing overseas port or logistics partnerships, the withdrawal shows how financing strain and political exposure can unwind large commitments. Companies with supply chains that rely on South Asian ports may see changes in shipping capacity and project timelines.
The takeaway
Large cross-border infrastructure deals carry risks that can surface quickly, so partners should stress-test financing and security assumptions before committing capital. Watching how these projects are restructured will show whether they can be sustained.
Further reading
For broader context on how companies weigh such ventures, explore more in Business Strategy.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Bizzbuzz.
Live Poll
Do you think large foreign-funded infrastructure projects usually benefit ordinary citizens?







