China Strengthens IP Protection, Procedural Hurdles Remain

Experts say foreign firms still face procedural barriers, including evidence notarisation, despite stronger intellectual property enforcement in China.

Updated on Nov. 4, 2026 in Language Learning

Bold vector editorial illustration of plain sealed envelopes with a wax seal beside a brass key, in cream, teal, and oxblood, evoking procedural barriers to intellectual property claims.
Chinese courts have strengthened IP protection, but foreign firms still face evidence notarisation hurdles, experts said at Macau's 23rd IP seminar. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Do you think foreign companies can fairly protect their patents and trademarks in China?

Experts speaking at the opening of the 23rd Seminar on Intellectual Property in Macau said China has significantly strengthened intellectual property protection in recent decades. Foreign companies still face procedural barriers, particularly in presenting and authenticating evidence.

Why it matters

China has become one of the world's innovation leaders, making its IP framework relevant to firms worldwide. Procedural requirements such as evidence notarisation can make infringement actions difficult for foreign small and medium-sized enterprises.

The seminar was the 23rd edition of its kind, held in Macau. Enforcement has expanded from three major cities to much of China, while litigation among Chinese companies covering patents, trademarks and copyright has grown.

The players

Anselm Kamperman Sanders

Professor of Intellectual Property Law at Maastricht University and Associate Professor at the Faculty of Law at Jinan University in Guangzhou.

Christopher Heath

Member of the Boards of Appeal at the European Patent Office, a body that hears appeals in European patent matters.

The details

Anselm Kamperman Sanders, Professor of Intellectual Property Law at Maastricht University and Associate Professor at Jinan University in Guangzhou, attended the seminar and commented on the state of Chinese IP enforcement. Christopher Heath, a member of the Boards of Appeal at the European Patent Office, also contributed to the discussion, which addressed evidence requirements that complicate infringement actions for foreign firms.

Timeline

  1. Over the last ten or twenty years: significant improvement in foreign firms' IP enforcement landscape in China.

  2. November 4, 2026: experts' comments published on the opening of the 23rd Seminar on Intellectual Property in Macau.

Legal Context

China's push for domestic innovation has pushed its courts and enforcement bodies to expand beyond Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou. As Chinese firms begin defending their IP assets internationally, litigation involving them abroad is expected to grow.

Foreign companies operating in or selling into China should plan for notarised evidence requirements before launching an infringement action. Firms can prepare documentation early to avoid procedural delays in enforcement.

The takeaway

Stronger IP protection in China does not remove procedural barriers for foreign companies. Firms that prepare authenticated evidence in advance are better positioned to enforce their rights.

Further reading

Explore more Language Learning coverage for context on how cross-border communication shapes legal and business practice.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Macau Business.

Live Poll

Do you think foreign companies can fairly protect their patents and trademarks in China?