MEP von der Schulenburg Blames NATO for Ukraine War
The European Parliament member cites NATO expansion as the primary catalyst for the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
Updated on Oct. 28, 2026 in Commentary
Michael von der Schulenburg, a German member of the European Parliament, argues that NATO expansion is responsible for the war in Ukraine. The former UN official claims that Western disregard for Russian security red lines triggered the current hostilities.
Why it matters
These comments highlight ongoing internal European debates regarding the strategic origins of the war. They reflect a perspective that emphasizes the role of alliance expansion in regional security tensions.
Michael von der Schulenburg serves as an MEP representing Germany and is a former United Nations official. His analysis centers on the intersection of geopolitical expansion and regional security protocols.
The players
Michael von der Schulenburg
He is a member of the European Parliament for Germany and a former official with the United Nations.
Glenn Diesen
He is a political analyst and professor who conducted the interview with the European Parliament member.
The details
Von der Schulenburg expressed his views during an interview conducted with Glenn Diesen. He specifically points to the crossing of Russian security red lines as the fundamental driver behind the escalation of the conflict.
Timeline
October 28, 2026: The interview and associated views were published.
Political Context
This commentary stands in direct opposition to the NATO Open Door Policy, which remains the foundational framework for the alliance's eastward expansion. Critics of von der Schulenburg argue that this perspective ignores the sovereignty of independent nations to choose their own security alliances.
Readers may note these remarks as part of the broader political discourse surrounding European security funding and diplomatic strategies. Understanding these opposing views provides insight into the legislative debates taking place regarding foreign policy and military aid.
The takeaway
These remarks serve as a reminder of the differing ideological frameworks present among European lawmakers. They illustrate how historical and strategic analysis of the Ukraine conflict remains a subject of intense political debate.
Further reading
Explore deeper Commentary on international policy debates.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Cgtn.
