Bank Statements Tie R400,000 Deposit to Mapisa-Nqakula
Pretoria High Court heard records of a R400,000 deposit into former Speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula's account in April 2019.
Updated on Nov. 11, 2026 in Financial Crime

Live Poll
Do you trust South Africa's courts to hold corrupt officials accountable?
The Pretoria High Court received bank statements showing a R400,000 deposit into the account of former Speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula in April 2019. She is on trial for allegedly soliciting bribes of up to R4.5 million from a businesswoman, and she denies the allegations.
Why it matters
The prosecution's case links bank records to alleged payments tied to defence contracts awarded while Mapisa-Nqakula was Minister of Defence and Military Veterans. The outcome bears on how allegations of corruption at the highest levels of government are tested in South African courts.
The trial of Mapisa-Nqakula on alleged bribery charges has been postponed to 11 November 2026. The R400,000 deposit and the alleged R4.5 million in payments remain allegations before the court.
The players
Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula
Former Speaker of South Africa's National Assembly and former Minister of Defence and Military Veterans, on trial on alleged bribery charges.
The details
Messages requesting a meeting 'in the bush' were allegedly linked to deposits into the account, according to the case presented in court. The businesswoman testified that Mapisa-Nqakula told her she had R6,000 in her account and needed money to pay a builder, a claim Mapisa-Nqakula denies. Mapisa-Nqakula said she had her own money from her government salary and could save, and her husband was reportedly unaware of the funds. She fell ill during her testimony.
Timeline
April 2019: The R400,000 deposit allegedly entered Mapisa-Nqakula's account.
Wednesday: Bank statements were submitted to the Pretoria High Court.
11 November 2026: The case is postponed to this date.
Legal Context
The case forms part of the wave of prosecutions of senior South African officials that followed the Zondo Commission's state-capture findings. It tests whether bank records and witness testimony can establish bribery by a former minister in the High Court.
Residents of South Africa who follow public spending should note the case concerns alleged bribes linked to defence contracts. The court's handling of the bank evidence will show how such allegations against former officials are proven or dismissed.
The takeaway
Bank records alone do not establish bribery; the court must weigh them against testimony and the accused's explanation. Readers can track the 11 November 2026 hearing for the next ruling on the evidence.
What happens next
The case resumes on 11 November 2026 in the Pretoria High Court.
Further reading
For related coverage of bank-record evidence in fraud and bribery matters, see Financial Crime.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Isolezwe.
Live Poll
Do you trust South Africa's courts to hold corrupt officials accountable?










