Appeal Court Overturns Eskom Compensation Award
The Labour Appeal Court set aside an order that Eskom pay a former job applicant six months' remuneration after he was excluded from a shortlist.
Updated on Nov. 5, 2026 in Job Search
Live Poll
Do you trust employers to set fair qualification requirements for promotions?
The Labour Appeal Court overturned a Labour Court order that Eskom pay Anele Gxumisa six months' remuneration, and dismissed his review application on 22 October. Gxumisa had not been shortlisted for an Eskom chief advisor position advertised in August 2020.
Why it matters
The ruling confirms that an employer's qualification requirements can stand when an applicant concedes he does not hold them. It also reinforces that courts will not award compensation a litigant did not request in his notice of motion.
The Labour Court had ordered Eskom to pay six months' remuneration at G17 level, a figure the Labour Appeal Court set aside. The advertised role required NQF level 7 qualifications worth 360 credits plus seven years of relevant experience.
The players
Eskom
Eskom is South Africa's state-owned electricity utility, and was the employer that advertised the chief advisor position and defended the dispute.
Anele Gxumisa
Anele Gxumisa is the former job applicant who was not shortlisted for the Eskom position and who challenged the exclusion through the CCMA and the courts.
The details
Eskom excluded Gxumisa from the shortlist because he did not meet the qualification requirement, a finding the CCMA commissioner upheld when dismissing his claim. Gxumisa conceded he did not hold the specified qualifications, and the appeal court found the Labour Court had awarded compensation he had not requested.
Timeline
August 2020: Eskom advertises the chief advisor position.
22 October 2026: The Labour Appeal Court upholds Eskom's appeal and dismisses Gxumisa's review application.
Legal Context
The ruling shows South African labour courts will enforce published job qualification requirements when an applicant admits he does not meet them. It also limits remedies to relief the litigant actually sought in his notice of motion.
Job applicants who lack a listed qualification may be excluded from shortlists, and courts may uphold that exclusion. Applicants should check advertised requirements carefully before applying.
The takeaway
Reading a job advertisement's listed qualifications against your own credentials before applying can save time and avoid a disputed shortlisting outcome.
Further reading
For more on how hiring rules are applied, see Job Search in South Africa.
Live Poll
Do you trust employers to set fair qualification requirements for promotions?
