Auditor-General Drops Crowe Over Disclosure Failure

The South African Auditor-General has terminated its contract with Crowe after the firm failed to disclose a regulatory fine.

Updated on Oct. 23, 2026 in Financial Crime

Bold flat-color editorial illustration showing a fractured geometric facade, evoking the gravity of an institutional regulatory decision.
The Auditor-General of South Africa has terminated its contract with audit firm Crowe following a failure to disclose a regulatory sanction. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should government agencies be required to immediately fire contractors who fail to disclose regulatory sanctions?

The Auditor-General of South Africa has ended its contract with the audit firm Crowe following the discovery that the company withheld information regarding a regulatory sanction against its lead partner, Gary Kartsounis. An audit committee noted that the failure to disclose the fine created concerns about professional reputation and audit quality.

Why it matters

The decision follows an investigation by PwC, which identified double-counting in a valuation of Lanseria Airport conducted by the firm. This move aims to protect the integrity of the institution's financial accounts after oversight committees flagged significant inconsistencies.

The Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors fined lead partner Gary Kartsounis R400,000 in March 2026. The Auditor-General is currently seeking a new external auditor to be approved by Parliament by November 2026.

The players

Gary Kartsounis

He is the lead partner at the audit firm Crowe who was fined R400,000 by the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors.

Crowe

This is an external audit firm that served the Auditor-General of South Africa until its contract was terminated in October 2026.

PwC

This professional services firm was commissioned to review audit files and identified issues regarding valuation experience and methodology.

Public Investment Corporation

This entity is a major investor that requested an investigation into the valuation of assets at Lanseria Airport.

The details

A PwC report revealed that Crowe incorrectly performed a valuation of a 25% stake in Lanseria Airport, which was linked to a defaulted loan of US$36.4 million. While extra checks confirmed the 2026 financial accounts were accurate, the oversight committee moved to replace the firm due to the lack of transparent communication.

Timeline

  1. 2013: The Public Investment Corporation lent R333.2 million to Acapulco.

  2. March 2026: The Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors fined lead partner Gary Kartsounis.

  3. 20 July 2026: Business Day reported on the regulatory fine.

  4. 23 October 2026: The Auditor-General's decision to terminate the contract was reported.

  5. January 2028: The original end date for the contract with Crowe.

Legal Context

The termination follows the rigorous standards set by the Public Finance Management Act's oversight requirements for state-appointed auditors. This action marks a significant enforcement of professional accountability protocols within South African public sector financial auditing.

The change in auditors ensures that state financial accounts are subject to rigorous and transparent review by a firm in good standing. Residents and taxpayers can expect continued parliamentary oversight as the institution transitions to a new service provider to maintain fiscal accountability.

The takeaway

This case highlights the critical importance of transparency and professional disclosure for firms handling state contracts. Organizations should ensure full compliance with regulatory reporting requirements to maintain their standing and avoid contract termination.

What happens next

Parliament's oversight committee must review and approve the appointment of a new external auditor by November 2026.

Further reading

For more information on regulatory oversight, visit the Financial Crime section.

Source note: This article includes information reported by The Rio Times.

Live Poll

Should government agencies be required to immediately fire contractors who fail to disclose regulatory sanctions?