South Africa Finalises Biodiversity Sharing Agreements
The government has established benefit-sharing models for Rooibos, Buchu, and Honeybush to support Indigenous communities.
Updated on Oct. 16, 2026 in Botany

Live Poll
Should government benefit-sharing agreements with indigenous communities require public disclosure of their calculation methodology?
South Africa has implemented a biodiversity benefit-sharing framework, finalising three industry-wide agreements as of 18 September 2025. These agreements are designed to ensure the Coi and San communities receive equitable compensation for the commercial use of native plant resources.
Why it matters
This system seeks to operationalise the fair and equitable sharing of benefits derived from biodiversity commercialisation. By formalising these structures, the government provides a legal pathway for Indigenous communities to participate in the economic value of regional botanical resources.
The Rooibos agreement mandates a 1.5% levy on farm-gate purchase value, while the Buchu agreement requires a 1.2% levy on annual net revenue. These figures form part of three realized agreements managed under the Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment.
The players
Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment
This national agency is responsible for overseeing environmental policy and approving biodiversity benefit-sharing agreements in South Africa.
Chirandu institute
This organisation is tasked with planning and implementing methodologies for valuation and payment reporting related to biodiversity assets.
Coi and San communities
These Indigenous communities are the primary beneficiaries of the new frameworks established for the commercial use of indigenous botanical products.
The details
The Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment approves all contracts to ensure terms are fair before they enter into force under the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act. The Chirandu institute is currently developing a three-stage methodology to manage valuation and payment reporting for these sectors.
Timeline
2004: The National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act was enacted.
2015: Official regulations regarding biodiversity agreements were issued.
2019: The Rooibos industry-wide agreement was established.
18 September 2025: The Honeybush benefit-sharing agreement was signed.
Deeper Dive
The framework follows the requirements set by Section 2(a)(iii) of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act to formalise financial distributions. This move represents a major effort to align commercial botanical exploitation with legal mandates for resource equity.
The implementation of these levies could influence the long-term retail pricing of products like Rooibos and Honeybush as companies adjust to new overhead costs. These agreements create a more structured environment for the botanical industry, potentially affecting the cost structure of raw materials used in consumer goods.
The takeaway
The formalisation of these agreements highlights a move towards greater transparency in how traditional botanical knowledge is monetised. Consumers and industry participants can expect increased regulatory oversight regarding the sourcing of indigenous plants in the coming years.
Further reading
Learn more about the local landscape in our Botany section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by PravdaReport.
Live Poll
Should government benefit-sharing agreements with indigenous communities require public disclosure of their calculation methodology?










