Court Denies Motion to Expedite NCAA Case

A federal court rejects the request to accelerate proceedings, setting a structured briefing schedule instead.

Updated on Oct. 26, 2026 in Basketball

Bold flat-color editorial illustration of stacked law books, conveying institutional and procedural legal authority.
A federal court denied a motion to expedite the lawsuit against the NCAA, keeping the current briefing schedule in place. AI Illustration. Upload story photo >

Live Poll

Should college athletes be permitted to compete while their legal cases against the NCAA are ongoing?

The court has denied a motion to expedite the legal case against the NCAA, choosing instead to establish a set schedule for briefs throughout November and December. Brenen Lorient and Javan Buchanan remain eligible to compete as the litigation continues.

Why it matters

The decision keeps the current case timeline in place, preventing a rapid resolution and ensuring the court maintains its standard schedule for review. The ruling ensures that West Virginia University and its student-athletes are not subject to NCAA enforcement actions during this period.

The NCAA is required to submit its opening brief by November 30, with a reply brief due 21 days following the submission of the opposing response. The current schedule reflects a delay of two months compared to the timeline requested in the motion to accelerate.

The players

NCAA

The National Collegiate Athletic Association serves as the primary governing body for college athletics in the United States.

West Virginia University

This public research university located in Morgantown competes as a member of the Big 12 Conference.

Brenen Lorient

He is a student-athlete currently playing basketball at West Virginia University.

Javan Buchanan

He is a collegiate basketball player currently enrolled and competing for West Virginia University.

The details

The court deferred the motion to expedite until a panel is assigned while affirming that the NCAA cannot enforce its Rule of Restitution against the university. The response brief from the defending party is currently scheduled for December 29.

Timeline

  1. September 30, 2026: The court granted a preliminary injunction in favor of the athletes.

  2. October 2, 2026: The NCAA filed a formal notice of appeal.

  3. November 2, 2026: The deadline for briefing on the pending motion to stay.

  4. First week of November 2026: A decision on the stay motion is anticipated.

  5. November 30, 2026: The deadline for the NCAA's opening brief.

Season Trajectory

This legal development ensures that the players remain eligible throughout the early season, preventing roster disruptions that could impact the team's competitiveness. It signals a period of ongoing legal uncertainty for the NCAA as it defends its rules against current court-ordered limitations.

The court's ruling guarantees that Brenen Lorient and Javan Buchanan remain on the active roster for upcoming games. Fantasy players and fans can count on their availability for the foreseeable future, as the NCAA is currently barred from enforcing restrictive rules against these specific athletes.

The takeaway

The court's decision prioritizes a standard legal process over an accelerated timeline, maintaining the current status quo for the athletes involved. Fans and followers of West Virginia basketball should prepare for a potentially protracted legal period that will extend well into the late fall.

What happens next

A decision on a potential stay is expected by the first week of November 2026, and the NCAA is prepared to refile its motion in the court of appeals if the current request is denied.

Further reading

For more information on the current status of the program, see the West Virginia Basketball coverage.

Source note: This article includes information reported by Sports Illustrated.

Live Poll

Should college athletes be permitted to compete while their legal cases against the NCAA are ongoing?