Family Sues Central Valley School District Over Collision

A civil trial is underway regarding a 2022 school bus crash involving a high school student in Spokane Valley.

Updated on Oct. 27, 2026 in Special Education

Family Sues Central Valley School District Over Collision

The family of a student who was struck by a school bus is suing the Central Valley School District for negligence. The lawsuit follows a 2022 collision at a Spokane Valley intersection that left the student with serious injuries.

Why it matters

The lawsuit centers on claims that the district is responsible for the injuries sustained by the student, despite investigations by local authorities. The litigation highlights the significant financial implications of life-altering injuries on a student's future career prospects.

An expert witness estimated the student would face nearly $2 million in lost lifetime earning capacity over a 37-year career. The bus driver involved was recorded traveling 8 miles per hour below the speed limit at the time of the incident.

The players

Central Valley School District

This is the public school system serving the Spokane Valley area that is currently being sued for negligence.

Spokane Valley Sheriff's Office

This local law enforcement agency conducted the investigation into the collision and concluded the bus driver was not at fault.

The details

The student, who was 15 at the time, was struck while walking across the intersection of Eighth Avenue and Sullivan Road. Investigations by the Spokane Valley Sheriff's Office concluded the student was at fault for running against a signal while on a FaceTime call, finding no responsibility on the part of the bus driver.

September 2, 2022: The student was struck by a school bus in Spokane Valley.
October 26, 2026: A civil trial regarding the lawsuit was continued.

Culture Shift

This case reflects the ongoing societal debate regarding the duty of care school districts hold toward students navigating public spaces. It highlights the tension between institutional responsibility and individual accountability in an era of constant mobile device usage.

This ongoing trial may influence how the local community approaches pedestrian safety near school routes and bus stops. Residents and families are reminded of the importance of traffic signal compliance and the hazards associated with using mobile devices while walking.

The takeaway

This case underscores the heavy burden of proof required in negligence lawsuits involving public institutions and pedestrian accidents. Families can take away the importance of reinforcing pedestrian safety habits, especially regarding the dangers of digital distractions in traffic.