SHRM Found Liable in Disability Accommodation Case
An Alexandria jury awarded a plaintiff $400,000 after finding the organization failed to comply with disability law.
Updated on Oct. 13, 2026 in Human Resources
Live Poll
Should employers be legally required to grant every specific accommodation requested by an employee?
A jury in Alexandria, Virginia, has found the Society for Human Resource Management liable for mishandling a disability accommodation request. The plaintiff, Fiona Torres, was awarded $400,000 in compensatory damages following the verdict.
Why it matters
The ruling underscores the legal obligations employers face when reviewing requests for medical service animals. The case clarifies the consequences for companies that revoke job offers due to an employee's need for disability-related accommodations.
The jury awarded the plaintiff $400,000 in compensatory damages. This outcome follows an unrelated $11.5 million verdict against the firm in a race discrimination case decided in December 2025.
The players
Society for Human Resource Management
This is a professional human resources membership association that provides resources and certifications for HR professionals.
Fiona Torres
She is the plaintiff in the lawsuit who sought employment with the Society for Human Resource Management.
The details
Fiona Torres alleged that the Society for Human Resource Management revoked her job offer in July 2024 after she requested to bring a medical service dog to work to detect blood-sugar fluctuations. Although the firm had offered alternative accommodations, including a continuous glucose monitoring system and an insulin pump, the jury determined the entity violated the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Virginia Human Rights Act.
Timeline
June 2024: The Society for Human Resource Management offered Fiona Torres a job role.
July 2024: The organization revoked the job offer after an accommodation request.
December 2025: A jury returned a $11.5 million verdict in an unrelated race discrimination lawsuit.
October 9, 2026: The jury found the Society for Human Resource Management liable in the current disability case.
Market Landscape
This verdict highlights the increasing legal scrutiny on corporate disability accommodation policies within the professional association sector. It marks a significant moment for the industry, reflecting broader challenges in balancing organizational policies with federal workplace mandates.
The ruling serves as a reminder for job seekers to document accommodation requests and potential rejections clearly during the hiring process. Employers in the area may review their current service animal policies to ensure compliance with federal and state mandates to mitigate similar legal risks.
The takeaway
Employers should ensure that their internal accommodation review processes align strictly with federal disability standards to prevent potential litigation. Job candidates who require specific medical accommodations are encouraged to keep formal records of their requests and subsequent company communications.
Further reading
Learn more about workplace compliance and personnel policies in the Human Resources section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Business Insider.
Live Poll
Should employers be legally required to grant every specific accommodation requested by an employee?
