UTRGV Faculty Challenge Senate Bill 37 Oversight
The local AAUP-AFT chapter is calling for greater transparency following the state-mandated abolition of the faculty senate.
Updated on Oct. 16, 2026 in Administration

Live Poll
Should faculty, rather than governing boards, have the primary role in deciding university curriculum content?
The UTRGV chapter of the AAUP-AFT has issued a formal statement expressing concerns about academic freedom under Texas Senate Bill 37. The union is now requesting formal meetings with university administration to discuss governance and curriculum oversight.
Why it matters
Faculty members argue that increased state oversight diminishes educational quality and fosters an environment of self-censorship. They are seeking clearer protections for academic freedom in the wake of legislative changes to higher education management.
The UTRGV AAUP-AFT chapter currently includes 77 members. Following the abolition of the faculty senate under Senate Bill 37, the university issued new guidelines for core curriculum reviews in September 2026.
The players
AAUP-AFT
This organization represents faculty members and advocates for academic freedom and professional rights in higher education.
Can Saygin
He serves as the Interim Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs at UTRGV.
The details
The union sent a letter to Interim Provost and Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs Can Saygin outlining fears of retaliation and the impact of external oversight. The administration continues to review curriculum and certificate programs as required by state law.
Timeline
September 2026: UTRGV issued new core curriculum review guidelines.
October 16, 2026: The AAUP-AFT published its statement regarding Senate Bill 37.
October 27, 2026: The interim provost is scheduled to meet with faculty representatives.
Culture Shift
The conflict reflects a growing national tension between state legislative oversight and the tradition of shared governance in public universities. This shift marks a departure from historic institutional independence as state mandates exert more direct influence on core academic operations.
Residents and students may see shifts in curriculum offerings as the university adjusts to new state-mandated review processes for core programs. The ongoing dialogue between faculty and administration could also influence campus morale and the university's long-term academic strategy.
The takeaway
The situation at UTRGV serves as a barometer for how public institutions are navigating new state legislative requirements. Faculty and administrators are now tasked with balancing statutory compliance with the continued need for internal academic transparency.
What happens next
The interim provost is scheduled to meet with representatives of the AAUP-AFT on October 27, 2026.
Further reading
For more context on university management, visit Administration.
Source note: This article includes information reported by MyRGV.
Live Poll
Should faculty, rather than governing boards, have the primary role in deciding university curriculum content?










