Advocates Addressed Global Religious Freedom Challenges
Panelists discussed the impact of armed conflict and state surveillance on religious freedom in Dallas.
Updated on Oct. 2, 2026 in Christianity
Live Poll
Should international advocacy groups defer to local leaders when addressing religious freedom in their communities?
Religious freedom advocates gathered at Dallas Baptist University to examine how ongoing global conflicts and invasive state surveillance technologies threaten religious expression. Experts highlighted the weakening of civil society in war-torn regions and the rise of transnational digital monitoring.
Why it matters
Armed conflicts complicate traditional advocacy by dividing communities along ethnic or tribal lines and straining civil society. These disruptions challenge established international channels, forcing activists to adapt their strategies for protecting religious rights.
Advocates currently track 65 active armed conflicts worldwide that threaten religious stability. Meanwhile, digital surveillance systems in China utilize facial recognition and movement tracking to monitor individuals both within and beyond the country’s borders.
The players
Wissam al-Saliby
He is the president of 21Wilberforce, an organization dedicated to defending religious freedom worldwide.
Jeremy P. Barker
He is an advocate who previously lived in northern Iraq for five and a half years while managing regional programming.
Bob Fu
He is a human rights activist who monitors state surveillance practices and the tracking of individuals by foreign governments.
Ted Vail
He is a religious leader who tracks the expansion of church movements throughout non-Western nations.
The details
During a session titled 'Advocacy in a Broken World,' speakers detailed how Chinese authorities track individuals using advanced data systems to enforce state control. Activists now rely on local partners to verify and approve advocacy petitions, ensuring that efforts align with the needs of affected populations on the ground.
Timeline
15 years ago, Beijing police conducted raids on local house churches for interrogation.
Five years ago, international UN bodies carried more weight in global advocacy work.
In May 2024, Wissam al-Saliby was appointed as president of 21Wilberforce.
On September 29, 2026, experts convened at Dallas Baptist University to discuss religious freedom.
Culture Shift
This pivot toward localized, non-Western advocacy signals a significant departure from the previous reliance on the 2024 UN advocacy protocols for religious minorities. The shift reflects a growing reality where traditional international channels are increasingly bypassed by global church movements.
Residents in the Dallas area may observe heightened focus on international religious liberty causes through local university programming. This trend encourages observers to evaluate how digital privacy and global conflict monitoring affect their own understanding of international human rights.
The takeaway
Activists are increasingly utilizing decentralized partnerships to navigate the constraints of modern digital surveillance and geopolitical instability. Implementing these local-first advocacy tactics allows for greater operational resilience in regions where state authorities monitor communication channels.
Further reading
For more information on current developments, visit the Christianity section.
Live Poll
Should international advocacy groups defer to local leaders when addressing religious freedom in their communities?
