Texas Taxpayers Funded Paxton Travel Costs
State records reveal $1.9 million in taxpayer spending for the security detail of Attorney General Ken Paxton.
Updated on Oct. 1, 2026 in Government
Live Poll
Should elected officials be required to publicly report the length and purpose of their official travel?
Texas taxpayers paid at least $1.9 million for the security detail travel expenses of Attorney General Ken Paxton since 2015. State records indicate Paxton took over 275 out-of-state trips during his 11-year tenure.
Why it matters
The expenditures have drawn scrutiny as official calendars show nearly 730 blank workdays over the same period. The attorney general's office maintains that travel was required for legal settlements and that security was necessary due to specific threats.
Security detail travel reimbursements surged from $30,000 in 2015 to nearly $400,000 in 2024. Records also show 112 blank workdays in 2024 out of 730 total blank days identified on official calendars.
The players
Ken Paxton
Ken Paxton has served as the Texas Attorney General for 11 years and has been the subject of multiple investigations during his time in office.
The details
Paxton took roughly 25 trips to California costing taxpayers approximately $180,000, including a 2024 wine country visit that cost $14,000. While the attorney general's office claims these trips were essential for securing legal settlements from drugmakers and tech companies, his official schedule often failed to account for the days spent away.
Timeline
In 2015, security detail travel reimbursements totaled about $30,000.
During 2021, Paxton had more than 90 blank workdays.
Former deputies testified about Paxton's travel to investigators in 2023.
In 2024, security detail travel reimbursements totaled nearly $400,000.
Last November, Paxton admitted to visiting California on a podcast.
Political Context
The use of the Texas Public Information Act allowed for the public review of state security detail reimbursement filings, which were central to identifying Paxton's travel records. This investigation highlights a departure from standard transparency expectations regarding the use of public funds for executive travel.
Taxpayers remain responsible for the rising costs of state-funded security details, which grew significantly over the last decade. This level of spending impacts the state budget and raises questions regarding the oversight of executive branch travel funds.
The takeaway
The scrutiny of these expenses emphasizes the importance of public records in tracking the use of taxpayer funds by elected officials. Readers should note that state agencies must justify travel costs when challenged by public audits or media inquiries.
Further reading
For more background on state leadership oversight, visit the Government section.
Live Poll
Should elected officials be required to publicly report the length and purpose of their official travel?
