Judge Dismisses Protection Orders Against Kevin Wisniewski
A Davidson County judge cleared Wisniewski of stalking claims, finding the allegations were knowingly false.
Updated on Oct. 26, 2026 in Motorsports
Live Poll
Do you trust the signature collection process for local ballot initiatives in your community?
A Davidson County judge dismissed stalking and harassment protection orders against Kevin Wisniewski on October 14, 2026. The court ruled that the accusations brought forward by employees of Citizens Against Racetrack Expansion were knowingly false.
Why it matters
The ruling marks a resolution in a legal dispute that stemmed from ongoing tensions regarding the future of the Fairgrounds Speedway in Nashville. Citizens Against Racetrack Expansion has been actively campaigning to replace the racing venue with greenspace and affordable housing.
A Davidson County judge ordered Citizens Against Racetrack Expansion employees to cover all legal fees, filing costs, and litigation taxes associated with the dismissed protection orders. The legal battle centers on a five-year dispute regarding the property.
The players
Kevin Wisniewski
He is the individual who was the subject of stalking and harassment protection orders that were ultimately dismissed by the court.
Citizens Against Racetrack Expansion
This is an organization actively campaigning to end racing activities at the Nashville Fairgrounds.
Zach Young
He is a complainant who alleged in July 2026 that petitioners associated with the speedway dispute were spreading false information.
The details
The judge issued the ruling following a hearing on October 14 that evaluated testimony regarding the conduct of CARE employees. The conflict intensified after Zach Young filed a complaint in July 2026 alleging that petitioners were spreading false information while gathering signatures.
Timeline
July 2026: Zach Young filed a complaint alleging petitioners spread false information.
August 19, 2026: Citizens Against Racetrack Expansion employees filed protection orders against Kevin Wisniewski.
October 14, 2026: A judge dismissed the protection orders and ruled the accusations were false.
Season Trajectory
This legal outcome impacts the competitive balance between local advocacy groups seeking land redevelopment and proponents of the Fairgrounds Speedway. It sets a precedent for how canvassing disputes will be handled as the five-year debate over the racetrack's future continues.
The court's decision forces Citizens Against Racetrack Expansion to pay all associated legal fees and court costs. This ruling may affect the organization's resources as they continue to lobby for the conversion of the Fairgrounds property into housing and greenspace.
The takeaway
This case highlights the importance of evidentiary standards when filing for protection orders during public disputes. Residents involved in local petitioning should be aware of the legal requirements and liabilities involved in documenting claims of harassment.
Further reading
Learn more about the ongoing local racing developments in the Motorsports section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by Wsmv.
Live Poll
Do you trust the signature collection process for local ballot initiatives in your community?
