Memphis Rap Artists Sued Over Album Copyright
The plaintiffs claim they are owed royalties for the 90s Memphis album Da Hard Ov Frayser.
Updated on Sept. 30, 2026 in Hip-Hop and Rap
Live Poll
Do you believe original artists should receive royalties when their old music is sampled by others?
Latonya Pierce and Christy Coran have filed a federal lawsuit against Carlos Duan Perry, known as DJ Sound, alleging copyright infringement. The artists claim Perry licensed their mid-90s album for a reissue without their consent.
Why it matters
The suit highlights ongoing disputes over ownership and royalties as 1990s hip-hop music sees a surge in commercial value due to modern sampling trends. Plaintiffs are seeking a legal declaration of authorship and a full accounting of licensing fees.
The lawsuit alleges plaintiffs are owed at least $500,000 for licensing rights. Historical payments to the two artists totaled approximately $13,800 and $13,650, respectively.
The players
Latonya Pierce
She is a Memphis-based recording artist who contributed to the album Da Hard Ov Frayser.
Christy Coran
She is a Memphis-based musician and plaintiff in the copyright lawsuit.
Carlos Duan Perry
Also known as DJ Sound, he is a producer named as the defendant in the copyright infringement case.
Now-Again Records
It is an independent record label that allegedly reissued the plaintiffs' album without authorization.
The details
The complaint alleges that Perry remastered the album by isolating vocals and instrumentals from original source materials to facilitate new licensing deals. Plaintiffs claim that a 2024 reissue of their work through Now-Again Records proceeded without their knowledge or consent.
Timeline
The album Da Hard Ov Frayser was recorded in the mid-90s.
The reissue of the album was licensed to Now-Again Records in October 2024.
Plaintiffs received approximate payments of $400 each from Perry in 2025.
The lawsuit was filed in federal court on September 28, 2026.
Industry Dynamics
This dispute mirrors the broader trend of legacy artists asserting copyright control as the commercial value of 90s hip-hop increases. It reflects the ongoing tension between original creators and producers who manage and license archived master recordings.
The litigation could lead to the temporary removal or restricted availability of the album on streaming platforms while ownership disputes are settled. Fans may see changes in how the catalog is presented or distributed as the court determines the legal rights of the parties involved.
The takeaway
Legacy artists should maintain clear documentation of their initial recording agreements to ensure they receive fair compensation as their music grows in value. Legal filings like this serve as a reminder for creators to secure formal copyright protections early in their careers.
Further reading
Explore the evolving legal landscape for artists by visiting the Hip-Hop and Rap section.
Source note: This article includes information reported by The Commercial Appeal.
Live Poll
Do you believe original artists should receive royalties when their old music is sampled by others?
